The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Divergent Stress Responses and Coping Styles in Psychogenetically Selected Roman High-(RHA) and Low-(RLA) Avoidance Rats: Behavioural, Neuroendocrine and Developmental Aspects
Open accessAbstract
The Swiss sublines of Roman high-(RHA/Verh) and low-(RLA/Verh) avoidance rats have been genetically selected for good vs. poor performance in two-way active avoidance since 1972. RLA/Verh rats show increased stress responses (e.g. freezing behaviour, ACTH, corticosterone and prolactin secretion) and adopt a more passive (or reactive) coping style when confronted with a novel environment. In the open field, elevated plus-maze, black/white box test, and in a new light/dark open field test, RLA/Verh rats appear to be more anxious than their RHA/Verh counterparts. Anxiety may result from their particular psychophysiological profile, i.e. increased emotionality combined with a passive coping style. In contrast, RHA/Verh rats are less responsive to stress, they show little anxiety in novel situations and tend to be impulsive and novelty (sensation) seekers. Some behavioural differences are already noticeable shortly after birth, but the full pattern appears to stabilize only after puberty. Gene-environment interactions are critical in establishing this pattern. The data reviewed indicate that the differences between RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh rats probably result from a complex interaction among divergent anxiety/emotionality characteristics, differences in locomotor activity and novelty/reward seeking, as well as active vs. passive coping styles. It is proposed further that these divergent personality types are to be found not only in other selective breeding programs but in the form of individual differences in most populations of rats used for this type of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999
Dunn, A. J., & Berridge, C. W. (1990) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(90)90012-d · Cited by 1,352
Cited by
Garland, T., Schutz, H., Chappell, M. A., Keeney, B. K., Meek, T. H., Copes, L. E., Acosta, W., Drenowatz, C., Maciel, R. C., van Dijk, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.048397 · Cited by 444
Overli, O. (2005) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/45.3.463 · Cited by 349
Identification of Glyoxalase-I as a Protein Marker in a Mouse Model of Extremes in Trait Anxiety
Krömer, S. A., Keßler, M. S., Milfay, D., Birg, I. N., Bunck, M., Czibere, L., Panhuysen, M., Pütz, B., Deussing, J. M., Holsboer, F., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0115-05.2005 · Cited by 263
Stead, J. D. H., Clinton, S., Neal, C., Schneider, J., Jama, A., Miller, S., Vazquez, D. M., Watson, S. J., & Akil, H. (2006) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-006-9058-7 · Cited by 209
Andrus, B. M., Blizinsky, K., Vedell, P. T., Dennis, K., Shukla, P. K., Schaffer, D. J., Radulovic, J., Churchill, G. A., & Redei, E. E. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.119 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Steimer, T., & Driscoll, P.
- Venue
- Stress
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-100
- ISSN
- 1025-3890 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-8888
- OpenAlex
- W1998166694
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Divergent Stress Responses and Coping Styles in Psychogenetically Selected Roman High-(RHA) and Low-(RLA) Avoidance Rats: Behavioural, Neuroendocrine and Developmental Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1025389031000111320
- The paper
- Steimer, T., & Driscoll, P. (2003). Divergent Stress Responses and Coping Styles in Psychogenetically Selected Roman High-(RHA) and Low-(RLA) Avoidance Rats: Behavioural, Neuroendocrine and Developmental Aspects. Stress. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025389031000111320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.