Cited by 414Food composition and propertiesProteins in Food SystemsFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 202 of the 202 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The food matrix: implications in processing, nutrition and health

Aguilera, José Miguel·2019·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

The concept of food matrix has received much attention lately in reference to its effects on food processing, nutrition and health. However, the term matrix is used vaguely by food and nutrition scientists, often as synonymous of the food itself or its microstructure. This review analyses the concept of food matrix and proposes a classification for the major types of matrices found in foods. The food matrix may be viewed as a physical domain that contains and/or interacts with specific constituents of a food (e.g., a nutrient) providing functionalities and behaviors which are different from those exhibited by the components in isolation or a free state. The effect of the food matrix (FM-effect) is discussed in reference to food processing, oral processing and flavor perception, satiation and satiety, and digestion in the gastrointestinal tract. The FM-effect has also implications in nutrition, food allergies and food intolerances, and in the quality and relevance of results of analytical techniques. The role of the food matrix in the design of healthy foods is also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2018.1502743

Cites

202 of 202 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 202 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1016/j.xphs.2015.10.0 · DOI
  2. Crowe, K. M. 2013. Designing functional foods with bioactive polyphenols: Highlighting lessons learned from original plant matrices. Journal of Human Nutrition & Food Science 1(3):1018.
  3. Ergun, R., and R. W. Hartel. 2009. Phase transitions in confections: the graining factor approach. Manufacturing Confectionary 89(10):51–5.
  4. Heertje, I. 1993. Structure and function of food products. A review. Food Structure 12:343–364.
  5. Raats, M. M., L. C. P. G. M. de Groot, and D. van Asselt. 2016. Food for the aging population. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
  6. WHO. 2016. Global report on diabetes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 413

Metadata

Authors
Aguilera, J. M.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Aguilera, José Miguel
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
59
Issue
22
Pages
3612-3629
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2884821233
Cited by
414
References
202
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FONDECYT (1150375)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
food matrix, food matrix effects, food processing, food microstructure, nutrient bioavailability, oral processing, flavor perception, satiation, satiety, gastrointestinal digestion, food allergy, food intolerance
MeSH terms
Food, Food Handling, Nutritional Status, Satiation, Taste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review