Interventions in food business organisations to improve food safety culture: a rapid evidence assessment
Open accessAbstract
The European Commission recently adopted Commission Regulation (EU) Citation2021/382 requiring food businesses to establish and provide evidence of a food safety culture (FSC). FSC incorporates management systems, risk perceptions, leadership, communication, environment and commitment to ensure food safety. This review (n = 20) investigates food safety interventions in food businesses to identify effective strategies to improve food safety practices and FSC, and to provide recommendations for improving FSC. Results found that most interventions focused on knowledge training and that workplace practical demonstrations produced the best outcomes. Similar training topics were used evidencing the existence of common training needs. Frequent training over longer time periods was most successful for behavioral change, yet no sustained behavioral change was reported, indicating that single knowledge-based interventions are insufficient, reinforcing repeated experiential learning to be incorporated into training. We suggest that FSC training should focus on FSC more broadly, rather than solely on knowledge training, and that management leadership skills in particular are important to ensure sustained positive change. This study contributes to knowledge by providing a summative overview of food safety interventions and how components of these may be used to enhance FSC in food businesses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world
Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.674 · Cited by 2,036 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For new habit formation to take place, repetition is necessary (Lally et al. 2010).”
Baş, M., Şafak Ersun, A., & Kıvanç, G. (2006) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.11.006 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Evaluation of the food safety training for food handlers in restaurant operations
Park, S.-H., Kwak, T.-K., & Chang, H.-J. (2010) · Nutrition Research and Practice · doi:10.4162/nrp.2010.4.1.58 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Food hygiene training: Introducing the Food Hygiene Training Model
Seaman, P. (2010) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.08.005 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Food safety training and evaluation of handwashing intention among fresh produce farm workers
Soon, J. M., & Baines, R. N. (2012) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.012 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
The hygiene training of food handlers at a teaching hospital
Acikel, C. H., Ogur, R., Yaren, H., Gocgeldi, E., Ucar, M., & Kir, T. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.008 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Adesokan, H. K., Akinseye, V. O., & Adesokan, G. A. (2015) · International Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1155/2015/328761 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Faour-Klingbeil, D., Kuri, V., & Todd, E. (2015) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.045 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- McCallion, S., Beacom, E., Dean, M., Gillies, M., Gordon, L., McCabe, A., McMahon-Beattie, U., Hollywood, L., & Price, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Ulster (GB)
- University College Cork (IE)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Safefood (IE)
- Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
- Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Ulster Business School, Ulster University
- Corresponding author
- Beacom, Emma
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-09-18
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 5066-5084
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W4402600030
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.ulster.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- by safefood, the Food Safety Promotion Board (02–2001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Chemical Health and Safety › Chemical Safety and Risk Management
- Keywords
- food safety culture, food safety interventions, food business, food safety training, experiential learning, behavior change, managerial leadership, food safety management systems, risk perception
- MeSH terms
- Commerce, Humans, Leadership, Organizational Culture, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review