Cited by 76Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

Beyond terror: Towards a paradigm shift in the study of threat and culture

Martin, Leonard L., van den Bos, Kees·2014·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

In this article we review the basic assumptions and findings of terror management theory. Then we discuss some problems with those assumptions and findings. We note, for example, that the theory is not falsifiable, that theorists have not done a good job of integrating conflicting empirical findings, and that attempts to explain all of human behaviour in terms of a single core motive have been counterproductive. Then we briefly discuss other theoretical explanations of the relations between threat and culture. Finally we make recommendations for what theorists and researchers can do to advance thinking in this area. The goal of the article is to stimulate a new generation of theory and research not based on the assumption that there is a single, core motive that can be used to address all of the relations among threat and culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10463283.2014.923144

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, L. L., & van den Bos, K.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2014-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
32-70
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W2018453515
Cited by
76
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 1
FWCI
20.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
terror management theory, culture, falsifiability, theoretical integration, paradigm shift, human behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review