Beyond terror: Towards a paradigm shift in the study of threat and culture
Abstract
In this article we review the basic assumptions and findings of terror management theory. Then we discuss some problems with those assumptions and findings. We note, for example, that the theory is not falsifiable, that theorists have not done a good job of integrating conflicting empirical findings, and that attempts to explain all of human behaviour in terms of a single core motive have been counterproductive. Then we briefly discuss other theoretical explanations of the relations between threat and culture. Finally we make recommendations for what theorists and researchers can do to advance thinking in this area. The goal of the article is to stimulate a new generation of theory and research not based on the assumption that there is a single, core motive that can be used to address all of the relations among threat and culture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This lack of evidence for the central TMT anxiety buffer hypothesis has been documented before in reviews regarding TMT research.
“This lack of evidence for the central TMT anxiety buffer hypothesis has been documented before in reviews regarding TMT research (Dar- Nimrod 2022; Fransen et al. 2019; Martin and Van den Bos 2014).”
From Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses (2025) · cites this paper as Martin and Van den Bos 2014
TMT is so diffuse it can account for any outcome and even seemingly opposing results can be interpreted as consistent with the theory.
“Previously it has been argued that TMT is so diffuse it can account for any outcome and even seemingly opposing results can be interpreted as consistent with the theory (e.g., Martin and Van den Bos 2014).”
From Terror Management Theory in the Consumer Domain: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on Mortality Salience Driven Consumer Responses (2025) · cites this paper as Martin and Van den Bos 2014
TMT has been criticized for being unfalsifiable because any finding could be interpreted as evidence in favor of the theory.
“TMT has been criticized for being unfalsifiable because any finding could be interpreted as evidence in favor of the theory (L. L. Martin & van den Bos, 2014).”
From Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies (2023) · cites this paper as L. L. Martin & van den Bos, 2014
Cites
Hardiness and health: A prospective study.
Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R., & Kahn, S. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168 · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60016-7 · Cited by 1,505 · see citing works
The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308 · Cited by 1,412 · see citing works
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In one study they had participants complete an implicit association test (Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) to assess their implicit self-esteem and then complete the Rosenberg (1965) inventory to assess their explicit self-esteem.”
BackgroundWhy Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296 · cited 16× · see citing works
“It can lead people to engage in healthpromoting or health-endangering behaviour (Arndt, Solomon, Kasser, & Sheldon, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialTwo Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The proponents of terror management theory were more likely to use American students, and such participants tend to display larger mortality salience effects (Burke et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHarmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & McGregor, H. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.24 · Cited by 677 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Although several studies have found support for this hypothesis (e.g., Gailliot, Schmeichel, & Maner, 2007; Goldenberg & Shackelford, 2005; Harmon-Jones et al., 1997; Kashima, Halloran, Yuki, & Kashima, 2004), several other studies have failed to support it (e.”
BackgroundResultGreenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.212 · Cited by 487 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It can increase tolerance (Greenberg et al., 1992) or it can increase aggression (McGregor et al.”
BackgroundThe Urge to Splurge: A Terror Management Account of Materialism and Consumer Behavior
Arndt, J., Solomon, S., Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1403_2 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior
Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702236834 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski, T. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.590 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Making Sense of Life: The Existential Self Trying to Deal with Personal Uncertainty
van den Bos, K. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903333411 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020524 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Dechesne, M., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Ransom, S., Sheldon, K. M., van Knippenberg, A., & Janssen, J. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.722 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account
Das, E., Bushman, B. J., Bezemer, M. D., Kerkhof, P., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.001 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00429.x · Cited by 297 · see citing works
A Function of Form: Terror Management and Structuring the Social World.
Landau, M. J., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Martens, A., Goldenberg, J. L., & Solomon, S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.190 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Niemiec, C. P., Brown, K. W., Kashdan, T. B., Cozzolino, P. J., Breen, W. E., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Ryan, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019388 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Greed, death, and values: From terror management to transcendence management theory
Cozzolino, P. J., Staples, A. D., Meyers, L. S., & Samboceti, J. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203260716 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Jonas, E., Martens, A., Niesta Kayser, D., Fritsche, I., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013593 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Greenberg, J., Martens, A., Jonas, E., Eisenstadt, D., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03454 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Taubman‐Ben‐Ari, O., Findler, L., & Mikulincer, M. (2002) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466602760344296 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Jonas, E., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.005 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Same but different: meta-analytically examining the uniqueness of mortality salience effects
Martens, A., Burke, B. L., Schimel, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.767 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Enjoying life in the face of death: East-West differences in responses to mortality salience
Ma-Kellams, C., & Blascovich, J. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029366 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Schimel, J., Wohl, M. J. A., & Williams, T. (2006) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9040-y · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Hirschberger, G. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164911 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Trafimow, D., & Hughes, J. S. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611432938 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Researcher Effects on Mortality Salience Research: A Meta-Analytic Moderator Analysis
Yen, C.-L., & Cheng, C.-P. (2013) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2012.682290 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thirty Years of Terror Management Theory
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
The role of close relationships in terror management: a systematic review and research agenda
Plusnin, N., Pepping, C. A., & Kashima, E. S. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317753505 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Mortality salience effects fail to replicate in traditional and novel measures
Sætrevik, B., & Sjåstad, H. (2022) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2020.2628 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Schindler, S., Hilgard, J., Fritsche, I., Burke, B., & Pfattheicher, S. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221107267 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“(L. L. Martin & van den Bos, 2014, p. 40).”
ResultVergani, M., O'Brien, K. S., Lentini, P., & Barton, G. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12488 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Terror in time: extending culturomics to address basic terror management mechanisms
Dechesne, M., & Bandt-Law, B. (2019) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1460322 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chen, L., Benjamin, R., Guo, Y., Lai, A., & Heine, S. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1254756/v1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Arendsen, J. L., Brugman, B. C., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., & Fransen, M. L. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70056 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Previously it has been argued that TMT is so diffuse it can account for any outcome and even seemingly opposing results can be interpreted as consistent with the theory (e.g., Martin and Van den Bos 2014).”
- Authors
- Martin, L. L., & van den Bos, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-70
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2018453515
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- terror management theory, culture, falsifiability, theoretical integration, paradigm shift, human behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review