Cited by 33Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningMedia Influence and Health

Testing the Death Thought Suppression and Rebound Hypothesis: Death Thought Accessibility Following Mortality Salience Decreases During a Delay

Trafimow, David, Hughes, Jamie S.·2012·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

It is an important hypothesis of terror management theory that death thoughts are suppressed immediately following a mortality salience treatment but that, after a short delay during which suppression ceases, death thoughts become more accessible. Although there is much indirect empirical support for this idea, there are few direct tests. Our goal was to test this hypothesis with simple experiments. Thus, after mortality was made salient, death thought accessibility was measured immediately or after a delay. The results contradicted the prediction that death thought accessibility should be higher in the delay condition than in the no delay condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550611432938

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trafimow, D., & Hughes, J. S.
Affiliations
  • New Mexico State University (US)
  • Daemen College (US)
Corresponding author
Trafimow, David
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2012-01-10
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
622-629
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2171575673
Cited by
33
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
rebound effect, terror management theory, mortality salience, death-thought accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review