Cited by 54Media and Digital CommunicationDigital Communication and LanguageImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Beyond Viral: Interpersonal Communication in the Internet Age

Berger, Jonah·2013·Psychological Inquiry

Abstract

The Internet has had a huge impact on human behavior. From meeting spouses and purchasing cars to interacting with friends and watching movies, the web has changed almost every facet of life. Along...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1047840x.2013.842203

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Berger, Jonah
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2013-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
293-296
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W2066698430
Cited by
54
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
interpersonal communication, internet, online communication, social behavior, digital media, human behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review