Cited by 92Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMedia and Digital Communication

“TikTok Is My Life and Snapchat Is My Ventricle”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of Online Communication Tools for Friendships in Early Adolescents

Open access
Mittmann, Gloria, Woodcock, Kate, Dörfler, Sylvia, Krammer, Ina, Pollak, Isabella, Schrank, Beate·2022·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

Early adolescents are frequent users of online communication tools (OCTs). Yet, we have limited knowledge about how OCTs influence this population and their friendships. We sought opinions of 938 Austrian early adolescents on the role of OCTs for their friendships via a questionnaire and 207 focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the focus groups. We found that despite the emergence of some online-specific aggression, OCTs are perceived as beneficial for friendships. Early adolescents use online spaces naturally and differentiate little between online and offline communication. Only when it comes to high levels of intimacy, early adolescents also need an offline setting to fulfill their communication need. Online communication tools, especially newer forms such as online gaming, can surpass a mere communicative function and provide a space for building and maintaining friendships. In the future, OCTs should be considered as a tool to facilitate positive development in early adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02724316211020368

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittmann, G., Woodcock, K., Dörfler, S., Krammer, I., Pollak, I., & Schrank, B.
Affiliations
  • Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tulln (AT)
Corresponding author
Mittmann, Gloria
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2021-06-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
172-203
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W3172911199
Cited by
91
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 2
FWCI
22.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ludwig Botzmann Gesellschaft Open Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
online communication tools, friendship, early adolescents, online aggression, online games, intimacy, offline communication, social media, adolescent development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review