Cited by 4Psychology Research and BibliometricsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

A Train Wreck by Any Other Name

Harris, Christine, Rohrer, Doug, Pashler, Harold·2021·Psychological Inquiry

Abstract

This interesting paper by Sherman and Rivers (in press) seems to have a narrower point (which its authors argue for very explicitly) and a broader point (which they argue for much less explicitly.)...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1047840x.2021.1889317

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Harris, C., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Pashler, Harold
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2021-01-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W3144836376
Cited by
4
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review