Cited by 674Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Social InfluenceDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Behavioral Priming: It’s all in the Mind, but whose Mind?

Open access
Doyen, Stéphane, Klein, Olivier, Pichon, Cora-Lise, Cleeremans, Axel·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The perspective that behavior is often driven by unconscious determinants has become widespread in social psychology. Bargh, Chen, and Burrows' (1996) famous study, in which participants unwittingly exposed to the stereotype of age walked slower when exiting the laboratory, was instrumental in defining this perspective. Here, we present two experiments aimed at replicating the original study. Despite the use of automated timing methods and a larger sample, our first experiment failed to show priming. Our second experiment was aimed at manipulating the beliefs of the experimenters: Half were led to think that participants would walk slower when primed congruently, and the other half was led to expect the opposite. Strikingly, we obtained a walking speed effect, but only when experimenters believed participants would indeed walk slower. This suggests that both priming and experimenters' expectations are instrumental in explaining the walking speed effect. Further, debriefing was suggestive of awareness of the primes. We conclude that unconscious behavioral priming is real, while real, involves mechanisms different from those typically assumed to cause the effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doyen and colleagues failed to find any significant results when using a double-blind procedure in a replication of a priming experiment.

    “When Doyen and colleagues49 attempted to replicate a previous experiment suggesting that priming participants with age-related stereotypes had an effect on walking speed50, they failed to find any significant results when using a double-blind procedure (prior studies were not blinded).”

    From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [49]

    Experiment 1 Methods describes blind assignment and keeping experimenters unaware of participants’ conditions; Experiment 1 Results reports no significant difference in walking speed between the primed and unprimed groups. The parenthetical overstates the comparison: the Introduction says the original study’s hallway timer was blinded, although it reports no comparable precaution for the experimenter who administered the task. “Any significant results” is also too broad, since Experiment 1 reports a significant result on a separate awareness measure. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An experimenter who knows the participants' condition may unintentionally act differently so that participants' behavior may be altered to confirm the researcher's hypothesis.

    “As demonstrated by Doyen et al. [25] the experimenter who knows the participants’ condition may unintentionally act differently so that participants’ behavior may be altered to confirm the researcher’s hypothesis.”
  • The use of single blind studies introduces the risk that the experimenter might unconsciously influence subjects.

    “The use of single blind studies, where the subject is blind to the treatment condition but the experimenter is not, introduces the risk that the experimenter might unconsciously influence the subjects (37).”
  • When making some experimenters believe that priming participants with age-related stereotypes would slow them down, this had a significant effect, but only in those experimenters that were made to believe in the stereotypes.

    “They further showed that when making some experimenters believe that priming participants with age-related stereotypes would slow them down, this indeed had a significant effect, but only in those experimenters that were made to believe in the stereotypes.”
  • Recent work indicates that experimenter biases are not a thing of the past.

    “Recent work indicates that experimenter biases are not a thing of the past.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C.-L., & Cleeremans, A.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Doyen, Stéphane
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e29081
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047874726
Cited by
670
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 10
FWCI
179.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
behavioral priming, unconscious priming, replication failure, walking speed, age stereotypes, expectancy effects, debriefing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Behavior, Humans, Psychology, Social, Psychomotor Performance, Unconscious, Psychology, Word Association Tests, Walking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review