Cited by 1,337Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The psychological consequences of money

Vohs, Kathleen D., Mead, Nicole L., Goode, Miranda R.·2006·Science

Abstract

Money has been said to change people's motivation (mainly for the better) and their behavior toward others (mainly for the worse). The results of nine experiments suggest that money brings about a self-sufficient orientation in which people prefer to be free of dependency and dependents. Reminders of money, relative to nonmoney reminders, led to reduced requests for help and reduced helpfulness toward others. Relative to participants primed with neutral concepts, participants primed with money preferred to play alone, work alone, and put more physical distance between themselves and a new acquaintance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1132491

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Money has strong social connotations and exerts substantial impact on pro-social behavior.

    “However, money has strong social connotations and, thus, exerts substantial impact on pro-social behavior (Vohs et al., 2006).”

    From Differentiating neural reward responsiveness in autism versus ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as Vohs et al., 2006

  • Money is imbued with social connotations and exerts a substantial influence on pro-social behavior.

    “Importantly, however, although monetary reinforcers have predominantly been operationalized and used as non-social stimuli, money is imbued with social connotations and exerts a substantial influence on pro-social behavior [64-66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vohs, Kathleen D.
Venue
Science
Published
2006-11-17
Volume
314
Issue
5802
Pages
1154-1156
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1965689506
Cited by
1,337
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 73
FWCI
40.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
money, self-sufficiency, dependency, social distance, priming, motivation, social behavior
MeSH terms
Behavior, Economics, Humans, Individuation, Interpersonal Relations, Motivation, Psychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review