The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social and cognitive dimensions of collaboration in informal learning spaces: Malaysian social science students’ perspectives
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to attain a better understanding of Collaborative Learning in Informal Spaces (CLIS) by addressing the nature of learning activities that will trigger socio-cognitive conflicts and the kind of socio-emotional challenges experienced in CLIS. To this end, research was conducted over four weeks where tasks were divided into pre-CLIS, during CLIS session and during CLIS presentation. The data in the form of video-stimulated semi-structured interviews were collected from 20 Year Two Gender Studies students of Monash University Malaysia. Based on the data collected, the students were divided into the Effective Learning Group (ELG) and the Lees Effective Learning Group (LELG). Consequently, the interview data were transcribed and analysed using the framework method as a form of thematic analysis. The results reveal that the LELG students require additional assistance from the lecturers and peers to overcome the pre-CLIS learning activities challenges. Further, ELG students are better at coordinating team members’ understandings leading to mutually shared cognition. Worthy of note is that the LELG students need to accept the fact that in collaborative learning, a socio-emotional atmosphere is strongly present and they have to learn to regulate the conflict rather than avoiding it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“our results echo concerns raised in prior research about the potential for group assignments to exacerbate frustration and inequities among students (Chang-Tik & Goh, 2020).”
From Intentional Grouping: Impacts on Cognitive and Social Presence in a Hybrid Classroom (2025) · cites this paper as Chang-Tik & Goh, 2020
Citations
Cites
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776 · cited 1×
“Significantly, studies have shown that student-led and inquiry-based activities are very challenging, and students’ skills to collaborate effectively are not self-evident (Kirschner et al., 2006).”
BackgroundIs there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1080/10494820.2020.1728342 · DOI
- 10.3166/ria.16.587-620 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Bereiter C., 2002, Education and mind in the modern age
- 10.4324/9781315617572-34 · DOI
- Boekaerts M., 2011, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 408
- 10.1207/s15430421tip4301_4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506 · DOI
- Dillenbourg P., 2002, Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, 61
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/1464-0597.00142 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11251-006-9008-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/17439880500093612 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221546.2018.1442638 · DOI
- 10.11613/BM.2012.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1469787417731176 · DOI
- Op’t Eynde P., 2007, Emotions in education, 185
- 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0 · DOI · Paper page
- Pea R. D., 1993, Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations, 47
- 10.1111/bjso.12015 · DOI
- Stahl, G. A. (2000, June). A model of collaborative knowledge building [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/1046496406292938 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.237 · DOI
- Van Merrienboer J. J. G., 1997, Training complex cognitive skills
- Whiteside A., 2010, Educause Quarterly, 33, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intentional Grouping: Impacts on Cognitive and Social Presence in a Hybrid Classroom
Scheidler, B., Layne, K., Gillard, M., & Doucet, B. M. (2025) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Education · doi:10.26681/jote.2025.090210
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang-Tik, C., & Goh, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Chang-Tik, Chan
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 609-623
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W3046826673
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Monash University Malaysia Learning and Teaching Research Grant (E/EE/LTG_11/2018/01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- socio-cognitive conflict, social-emotional problems, shared cognition, peer learning, conflict regulation, social sciences students, gender studies education, student perceptions, Malaysian higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social and cognitive dimensions of collaboration in informal learning spaces: Malaysian social science students’ perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799029
- The paper
- Chang-Tik, C., & Goh, J. N. (2023). Social and cognitive dimensions of collaboration in informal learning spaces: Malaysian social science students’ perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799029