Cited by 127Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health via WritingPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Does gratitude writing improve the mental health of psychotherapy clients? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial

Wong, Y. Joel, Owen, Jesse, Gabana, Nicole T., Brown, Joshua W., McInnis, Sydney, Toth, Paul, Gilman, Lynn·2018·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Although the past decade has witnessed growing research interest in positive psychological interventions (PPIs), their potential as adjunctive interventions for psychotherapy remains relatively unexplored. Therefore, this article expands the frontiers of PPI research by reporting the first randomized controlled trial to test a gratitude writing adjunctive intervention for psychotherapy clients. Participants were 293 adults seeking university-based psychotherapy services. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (a) control (psychotherapy only), (b) a psychotherapy plus expressive writing, and (c) a psychotherapy plus gratitude writing. Participants in the gratitude condition wrote letters expressing gratitude to others, whereas those in the expressive writing condition wrote about their deepest thoughts and feelings about stressful experiences. About 4 weeks as well as 12 weeks after the conclusion of the writing intervention, participants in the gratitude condition reported significantly better mental health than those in the expressive and control conditions, whereas those in the expressive and control conditions did not differ significantly. Moreover, lower proportions of negative emotion words in participants' writing mediated the positive effect of condition (gratitude versus expressive writing) on mental health. These findings are discussed in light of the use of gratitude interventions as adjunctive interventions for psychotherapy clients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2016.1169332

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, Y. J., Owen, J., Gabana, N. T., Brown, J. W., McInnis, S., Toth, P., & Gilman, L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Y. Joel
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2016-05-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
192-202
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2345774771
Cited by
127
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
26.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
expressive writing, positive psychology interventions, adjunctive psychotherapy, mental health, negative emotion words, mediation, gratitude letter
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psychotherapy, Writing, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review