Cited by 241Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Attrition from self-directed interventions: Investigating the relationship between psychological predictors, intervention content and dropout from a body dissatisfaction intervention

Geraghty, Adam W.A., Wood, Alex M., Hyland, Michael E.·2010·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (a) identify the predictors of attrition from a fully self-directed intervention, and (b) to test whether an intervention to increase gratitude is an effective way to reduce body dissatisfaction. Participants (N=479, from the United Kingdom) aged 18-76 years took part in a self-help study via the Internet and were randomized to receive one of two interventions, gratitude diaries (n=130), or thought monitoring and restructuring (n=118) or a waitlist control (n=231) for a two week body dissatisfaction intervention. The gratitude intervention (n=40) was as effective as monitoring and restructuring (n=22) in reducing body dissatisfaction, and both interventions were significantly more effective than the control condition (n=120). Participants in the gratitude group were more than twice as likely to complete the intervention compared to those in the monitoring and restructuring group. Intervention content, baseline expectancy and internal locus of control significantly predicted attrition. This study shows that a gratitude intervention can be as effective as a technique commonly used in cognitive therapy and is superior in retaining participants. Prediction of attrition is possible from both intervention content and psychological variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.007

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of an online body dissatisfaction intervention, participants who completed a gratitude diary were twice as likely to complete the intervention compared with a thought-monitoring and cognitive-restructuring group.

    “In a study of an online body dissatisfaction intervention, participants who completed a gratitude diary were twice as likely to complete the intervention compared with a thought-monitoring and cognitive-restructuring group [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geraghty, A. W. A., Wood, A. M., & Hyland, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Geraghty, Adam W.A.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
30-37
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150861271
Cited by
241
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
attrition, dropout, self-guided intervention, body dissatisfaction, gratitude interventions, cognitive restructuring, online self-help, intervention content, locus of control, expectancy, participant retention, predictors of attrition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Image, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Personal Satisfaction, Psychotherapy, Self-Help Groups, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review