Cited by 90Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Predictors of social identification in group therapy

Open access
Cruwys, Tegan, Steffens, Niklas K., Haslam, S. Alexander, Haslam, Catherine, Hornsey, Matthew J., McGarty, Craig, Skorich, Daniel P.·2020·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Background: Group therapy is a popular and effective format for psychological intervention, and both anecdotal and empirical data consistently point to group dynamics as a primary driver of its benefits. However, to date there has been no systematic investigation of what facilitates an engaged, cohesive group environment. We argue that this is social identification and explore the features of groups that help to build this. Method: We present two longitudinal studies of group therapy and examine the predictors of social identification. Study 1 was a sample of psychiatric outpatients (N = 103) who completed group cognitive behavior therapy. Study 2 was a sample of young women with body shape or weight concerns (N = 112) who completed an eating disorder prevention program. Results: Multilevel analyses indicated that social identification was best predicted by participant fit with the therapy group, specifically the degree to which (1) participants were and perceived themselves to be similar to other group members, and (2) participants met the group therapy eligibility criteria at baseline. Conclusions: These results show that attending to issues of client fit in group therapy can improve social identification, with implications for reducing client attrition and improving client outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2019.1587193

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford: Blackwell.
  3. Oei, T. P. S. (2011). A group cognitive behavioural therapy manual for depression. 4 th edition. Jakarta, Indonesia: PLP3 University of Indonesia.
  4. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Group, and the P. H. Q. P. C. S. (1999). Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(18), 1737-1744.
  5. Stice, E., Rohde, P., & Shaw, H. (2013). The Body Project: A dissonance based eating disorder prevention intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L. & Ruderman, A. J. (1978) Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778- 793.
  7. Wegener, I., & Klauer, K. C. (2004). Intrapersonal versus interpersonal fit: When social categories match social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 567-593.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruwys, T., Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Hornsey, M. J., McGarty, C., & Skorich, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cruwys, Tegan
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2019-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
348-361
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2920110413
Cited by
89
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DE160100592 and FL110100199)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
social identification, group therapy, group dynamics, group cohesion, group cognitive behavioral therapy, eating disorder prevention, body image concern, customer churn, psychiatric outpatients
MeSH terms
Body Dissatisfaction, Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Identification, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Process Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review