Cited by 211Social and Intergroup PsychologyHealth disparities and outcomesDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Social identity makes group-based social connection possible: Implications for loneliness and mental health

Open access
Haslam, S.Alexander, Haslam, Catherine, Cruwys, Tegan, Jetten, Jolanda, Bentley, Sarah V., Fong, Polly, Steffens, Niklas K.·2022·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

This review argues that a distinctly positive form of social connection is made possible by the social identities that people derive from psychologically meaningful group memberships. These connections have important implications for mental health by virtue of their distinct capacity to furnish people with a sense of collective meaning, purpose, support, and efficacy. This analysis suggests that loneliness and its toxic effects arise in part from the challenges of achieving this distinct form of social connection in contemporary society. However, it also suggests that a good way to tackle loneliness and support mental health is by building, restoring, and sustaining social identities through meaningful group-based connections. We conclude by reflecting on the success of interventions that do precisely this - most notably Groups 4 Health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.013

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Group-based solutions are theoretically aligned with the social identity approach to health, which conceptualizes loneliness as secondary to the loss or lack of group memberships and the social identities that arise from them.

    “These group-based solutions are theoretically aligned with the social identity approach to health, which conceptualizes loneliness as secondary to the loss or lack of group memberships and the social identities that arise from them (Cruwys et al., 2014;Haslam et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Jetten, J., Bentley, S. V., Fong, P., & Steffens, N. K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Haslam, S.Alexander
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
43
Pages
161-165
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3186864615
Cited by
211
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social identity, group membership, social connectedness, loneliness, mental health, collective meaning, social support, sense of efficacy, group intervention
MeSH terms
Humans, Loneliness, Mental Health, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review