Cited by 138Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Are individual and group treatments equally effective in the treatment of depression in adults? A meta-analysis

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, van Straten, Annemieke, Warmerdam, Lisanne·2008·The European Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and Objectives: It is well-established that psychological interventions are effective in the treatment of depression.However, it is not yet clear what the optima format is in which psychological treatments should be delivered.Although several studies have examined whether individual and group treatments are equally effective in the treatment of depression, no comprehensive meta-analysis has examined this. Methods:We searched major bibliographical databased and conducted a meta-analysis of 15 studies in which individual and group therapies were compared directly to each other. Results:The mean effect size indicating the difference between individual and group therapies in depressive symptomatology at post-test was 0.20 (95% CI: [0.05 0.35]; p < 0.01), in favor of individual therapies, with a lower drop-out rate in individual interventions (OR = 0.56; 95% CI: [0.37, 0.86]; p < 0.01).At follow-up no significant differences were found.Conclusions: Although individual therapy seems to be somewhat more effective than group therapy at the short term, it is not clear whether this is relevant from a clinical point of view.Because of the small number of studies and the limited quality, more research is needed to examine whether the difference between individual and group treatment is clinically relevant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4321/s0213-61632008000100005

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of activity sched- uling. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27: 318-326.
  2. Zettle RD, Haflich JL, Reynolds RA. Responsivity to cognitive therapy as a function of treatment format and client personality dimensions. J Clin Psychol 1992; 48: 787-797.
  3. Vos T, Corry J, Haby MM, Carter R, Andrews G. Cost-effectiveness of CBT and drug interventions for major depression. Austr Nw Zeal J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 683-692.
  4. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK.
  5. Banken DM. Group versus individual cognitive- behavioral treatment for depression. Washington State University, Dissertation, 1993.
  6. Shapiro J, Sank LI, Shaffer CS, Donovan DC. Cost effectiveness of individual vs. group cognitive behavior therapy for problems of depression and anxiety in an HMO population. J Clin Psychol 1982; 38: 674-677.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Warmerdam, L.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The European Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
ISSN
0213-6163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153193886
Cited by
137
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The European Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression, individual psychotherapy, group therapy, depressive symptoms, treatment discontinuation, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review