CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism

Moss, Simon A., White, Barbara, Lee, Jim·2018·Ethics & Behavior
DOI 10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interventions that are designed to stem plagiarism do not always override the motivation of individuals to cheat and, therefore, may not diminish misconduct. To inform more effective approaches, we conducted a systematic review to clarify the psychological causes of plagiarism. This review of 83 empirical papers showed that a specific blend of circumstances may foster plagiarism: an emphasis on competition and success rather than development and cooperation coupled with impaired resilience, limited confidence, impulsive tendencies, and biased cognitions. Fortunately, whenever students feel their life and studies align to their future aspirations, many of these circumstances tend to dissipate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 128

  1. Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
  2. 10.1080/14792779943000116 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003 · DOI
  4. *Angell L. R., 2006, College Student Journal, 40, 118
  5. 10.1163/156916203322847164 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/09639284.2011.650452 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/0260293042000264226 · DOI
  8. Barry E. S., 2006, College Student Journal, 40, 377
  9. 10.1037/a0018062 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/658339 · DOI
  11. *Batane T., 2010, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13, 1
  12. 10.1177/0098628310390851 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/0260293042000264244 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/02602930802471801 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/096582199387931 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/02602930802075115 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/741938174 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1422937\ · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.432 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/13562517.2015.1016418 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/bjet.12054 · DOI
  22. *Chireshe R., 2014, South African Journal of Higher Education, 28, 45
  23. Cooper J., 2007, Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory, 10.4135/9781446214282 · DOI
  24. Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual
  25. 10.1080/02602930500262478 · DOI
  26. 10.2304/plat.2013.12.3.282 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/1469787407074110 · DOI
  28. 10.2190/9087-8Q74-1875-0L1G · DOI
  29. 10.1002/acp.1129 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/10400419.2015.992679 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/10508422.2013.869747 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/ijpor/12.3.254 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/02602930802687745 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0098628310390848 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/02602938.2014.880776 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.571 · DOI
  37. Festinger L., 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance, 10.1515/9781503620766 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1186/1472-6939-15-43 · DOI
  39. *Gilmore J., 2010, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6, 13
  40. 10.1007/s11031-012-9309-2 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<897::AID-JOB975>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  43. *Hale J. L., 1987, Communication Research Reports, 4, 66, 10.1080/17464099.1987.12289983 · DOI
  44. 10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/15391523.2013.10782604 · DOI
  46. 10.3233/EFI-2006-242-302 · DOI
  47. 10.2307/378403 · DOI
  48. Howard R. M., 2005, Guiding students from cheating and plagiarism to honesty and integrity: Strategies for success
  49. 10.1080/10508422.2014.923313 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s11218-011-9166-y · DOI
  51. 10.1080/01425692.2012.686897 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.001 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.016 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.005 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/10508422.2014.908380 · DOI
  56. 10.3758/BF03209404 · DOI
  57. 10.1080/10508422.2013.787360 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.006 · DOI
  59. *Lester M. C., 2002, Journal of College Student Development, 43, 906
  60. 10.1080/15205436.2013.768346 · DOI
  61. 10.1177/107769581106600403 · DOI
  62. 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.387 · DOI
  63. *Love P. G., 1998, College Student Journal, 32, 539
  64. 10.1080/10508420701519387 · DOI
  65. 10.1521/soco.1999.17.3.273 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/00049530412331283426 · DOI
  67. 10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.673 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1568 · DOI
  69. 10.3758/BF03201091 · DOI
  70. 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.886 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/10508420802623666 · DOI
  72. 10.17730/humo.70.1.nl775v2u633678k6 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2 · DOI
  74. *Maxwell A., 2006, Guidance & Counseling, 21, 210
  75. *Maxwell A., 2008, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4, 25
  76. 10.3758/BF03193444 · DOI
  77. 10.1080/10528008.2008.11489033 · DOI
  78. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1375/acri.43.1.130 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00993.x · DOI
  81. 10.1111/ajpy.2013.65.issue-1 · DOI
  82. 10.1080/09658211.2011.590503 · DOI
  83. 10.1037/a0013936 · DOI
  84. 10.1080/09658210801946501 · DOI
  85. 10.1080/1359432X.2011.555080 · DOI
  86. 10.1046/j.1467-9507.2006.00344.x · DOI
  87. Puga J. L., 2014, European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7, 131, 10.30552/ejep.v7i2.102 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/02602938.2011.596926 · DOI
  89. 10.1007/BF03395215 · DOI
  90. 10.2466/PR0.84.3.973-982 · DOI
  91. 10.3200/JRLP.139.6.485-494 · DOI
  92. 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.691 · DOI
  93. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01091.x · DOI
  94. 10.1080/01639625.2012.735909 · DOI
  95. 10.1207/s15328023top3104_6 · DOI
  96. Schwabl K., 2013, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59, 401, 10.55016/ojs/ajer.v59i3.55730 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.005 · DOI
  98. 10.1080/02602930701563104 · DOI
  99. 10.1017/CBO9781139175043 · DOI
  100. 10.1080/10508420701519163 · DOI
  101. *Skaar H., 2013, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9, 15
  102. 10.1080/10508422.2011.604294 · DOI
  103. 10.1080/07294360.2012.673573 · DOI
  104. 10.1002/acp.1216 · DOI
  105. 10.1080/09658210701643042 · DOI
  106. 10.3758/MC.36.1.65 · DOI
  107. 10.1080/09658210444000232 · DOI
  108. 10.1080/10508420701519197 · DOI
  109. 10.1177/0146167213481067 · DOI
  110. 10.1185/03007995.2012.728131 · DOI
  111. 10.1177/1469787404043815 · DOI
  112. 10.2307/1423550 · DOI
  113. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.248 · DOI
  114. 10.1111/1467-8535.00343 · DOI
  115. 10.1177/0146167210383043 · DOI
  116. *Voiskounsky A. E., 2009, Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 25, 64
  117. 10.1002/acp.2842 · DOI
  118. *Wheeler G., 2014, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10, 44
  119. Wilkinson R., 2009, The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better
  120. 10.1037/a0020773 · DOI
  121. 10.1080/09639284.2010.534577 · DOI · Paper page
  122. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.005 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.008 · DOI
  124. 10.1080/10508422.2012.672904 · DOI
  125. 10.1080/10508422.2012.672907 · DOI
  126. 10.1080/07294360701310813 · DOI
  127. *Yu-Chih S., 2012, Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 296
  128. 10.1087/20120408 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
  • School of Psychological and Clinical Sciences Charles Darwin University
  • School of Engineering and Information Technology Charles Darwin University
ORCID
Moss, Simon A.
Venue
Ethics & Behavior
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
261-283
ISSN
  • 1050-8422
  • 1532-7019
DOI
10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837
Cited by
49
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review