Cited by 194Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Religious Involvement, Gratitude, and Change in Depressive Symptoms Over Time

Open access
Krause, Neal·2009·International Journal for the Psychology of Religion

Abstract

Three hypotheses are evaluated in this study. The first predicts that feelings of gratitude will offset (i.e., moderate) the deleterious effects of chronic financial strain on depressive symptoms over time. The second hypothesis specifies that people who go to church more often will be more likely to feel grateful. The third hypothesis predicts that individuals with a strong sense of God-mediated control will also feel more grateful. Data from a nationwide longitudinal study of older adults in the United States (N = 818) provide support for all three hypotheses. The data suggest that the effects of ongoing economic difficulty on depressive symptoms are especially pronounced for older people who are less grateful. But in contrast, persistent financial difficulties fail to exert a statistically significant effect on depressive symptoms over time for older individuals who are especially grateful. The results further reveal that more frequent church attendance and stronger God-mediated control beliefs are associated with positive changes in gratitude over time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508610902880204

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 178 highest-rigor studies on R/S and depression, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression.

    “Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [130]

    The Results sections report that religious involvement is associated with greater gratitude and that gratitude moderates the effect of financial strain on depressive symptoms. They do not report an inverse relationship between religious involvement and depression, or the claimed tally of 178 studies, 119 inverse findings, and 13 positive findings (searched for those numbers and for methodological rigor). Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among the 10 highest quality studies on R/S and forgiveness, seven (70%) reported greater forgiveness among more R/S.

    “Among the 10 highest quality studies, seven (70%) reported greater forgiveness among the more R/S [116–119], a finding that recent research has supported [120].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [118]

    The Religious Influences on Gratitude and Results sections address religious involvement, gratitude, and depressive symptoms, not forgiveness. Searches for forgiveness and for the seven-of-ten figure found no passage addressing the cited claim; the paper also does not substantiate the sentence’s assertion that recent research supports that finding. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Groves RM Fowler FJ Couper MP Lepkowski JM Singer E Tourangeau R 2004 Survey methodology New York Wiley-Interscience

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, Neal
Venue
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Published
2009-06-23
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
155-172
ISSN
  • 1050-8619 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7582
OpenAlex
W2011458583
Cited by
194
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG009221, R01AG014749)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
gratitude, depressive symptoms, financial stress, church attendance, religious involvement, older adults, moderation, longitudinal change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review