The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Experiment on the Effects of Self-disclosure on Perceived Partner-Responsiveness and Intimacy in Zero-Acquaintance Relationships
Abstract
Self-disclosure and perceived partner responsiveness are the key ingredients in intimacy development. Using the interpersonal process model of intimacy as a theoretical framework, this article proposes that participants’ own self-disclosure affects their perceptions of partner responsiveness, even when the partner’s actual responsiveness is held constant, and that this perceived partner responsiveness increases relational intimacy. Findings from an experiment (N= 253) showed that participants’ high (vs. low) intensity self-disclosure led to higher perceived partner responsiveness, which in turn increased intimacy. The valence and channel of self-disclosure did not moderate the link between the intensity of self-disclosure and perceived partner responsiveness, but the channel of self-disclosure affected perceived partner responsiveness, with participants who interacted face-to-face reporting higher perceived partner responsiveness than those who interacted over computer-mediated communication. Theoretical and practical implications for the intimacy process are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research indicates that self-disclosure can help maintain strong interpersonal connections, enhance intimacy among partners, and contribute to greater satisfaction in friendships.
“Research indicates that self-disclosure can help maintain strong interpersonal connections, enhance intimacy among partners, and contribute to greater satisfaction in friendships [25,26].”
From Self-Concept Clarity and Loneliness among College Students: The Chain-Mediating Effect of Fear of Negative Evaluation and Self-Disclosure (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings
Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297234003 · Cited by 902 · cited 2×
“Closeness-Generating Inventory (Aron et al., 1997) and the Relationship Closeness Induction task (Sedikides et al.”
MethodLaurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314 · Cited by 564
Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire.
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000069 · Cited by 125
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Altman I., 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00016.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0261927X93121003 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224545.1983.9712017 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0036614 · DOI
- 10.1080/08934215.2019.1607516 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0033950 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261927X15602515 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00280.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00106.x · DOI
- 10.1080/03637750903310360 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jcom.12029 · DOI
- Kline R. B, 2012, Handbook of structural equation modeling, 111
- Kornmeier J., 2012, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1
- 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0030422 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11031-013-9381-2 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4605_12 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-31129-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2190/N9PC-CKMD-JKRR-1VJM · DOI
- 10.1080/10410236.2012.714861 · DOI
- Rains S. A., 2015, Communication Research
- Reis H. T., 2004, Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 201
- Reis H. T., 1988, Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions, 367
- Rosseel Y, 2017, Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1
- 10.1111/jcc4.12179 · DOI
- Sedikides C., 1999, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1
- 10.1177/0265407509346422 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/1094931041291295 · DOI · Paper page
- Tang Y., 2019, International Journal of Communication, 13, 2457
- 10.1177/0146167286122011 · DOI
- 10.1177/009365096023001001 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pang, T., Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14030194 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, M., & Toma, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Choi, Mina
- Venue
- Communication Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-04
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-313
- ISSN
- 1051-0974 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1035
- OpenAlex
- W4281615651
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- self-disclosure, perceived partner responsiveness, relationship intimacy, disclosure intensity, disclosure channels, face-to-face interaction, computer-mediated communication, romantic relationships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review