Cited by 71Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Experiences and Perceptions of Online Sexual Solicitation and Grooming of Minors: A Retrospective Report

Greene-Colozzi, Emily A., Winters, Georgia M., Blasko, Brandy, Jeglic, Elizabeth L.·2020·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

Internet predation of minors has become a focus of child sexual abuse research and legislation. Studies reveal that many American youth report experiencing sexual solicitation and sexual grooming online, but the youth perspective of these experiences has not been examined. This study examined retrospective perspectives of online sexual solicitation and grooming experienced as a minor. Participants were 1,133 undergraduate college students at two public institutions in the United States who completed an online survey retrospectively exploring Internet behaviors, experiences of online sexual solicitation or online grooming, and perceptions of the experience. Results showed that one-quarter of total participants conversed with adult strangers online as minors. Importantly, 65% of participants who chatted with adult strangers as minors experienced sexual solicitation from an adult stranger. Twenty-three percent of 1,133 total participants recalled having a long, intimate conversation as a minor with an adult stranger from an online chatroom that followed a pattern of online sexual grooming. While less than half (38%) of the youth who engaged in an intimate online relationship with an adult stranger met the adult in-person, a large majority of those who did meet in-person (68%) reported physical sexual intercourse. Implications for Internet safety and guidelines are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2020.1801938

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence rate of 23% was determined based on a very broad single item asking for having a long, ongoing online conversation with an adult stranger.

    “For example, the prevalence rate of 23% was determined based on a very broad single item asking for having a long, ongoing online conversation with an adult stranger (Greene-Colozzi et al., 2020), while the prevalence rate of 12.2% was determined based on a very specific single item asking for being deceived by an adult with a fake profile to make sexual or intimate requests (Alonso-Ruido et al.,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene-Colozzi, E. A., Winters, G. M., Blasko, B., & Jeglic, E. L.
Affiliations
  • John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
  • Joseph J. Peters Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Corresponding author
Greene-Colozzi, Emily A.
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2020-10-02
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
836-854
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W3091760893
Cited by
69
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
online sexual solicitation, online sexual grooming, child sexual abuse, chat rooms, youth perspectives, online safety, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Deception, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk-Taking, Sex Offenses, United States, Internet, Minors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review