Cited by 85Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of community-based treatment for problem gambling: A quasi-experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral vs. twelve-step therapy

Toneatto, Tony, Dragonetti, Rosa·2008·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

With the increasing availability of gambling throughout North America, there is interest in developing more effective treatments. This study compares the effectiveness of two brief outpatient treatments for problem gambling: eight sessions of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (n = 65) and eight sessions of a twelve-step treatment-oriented approach based on the first five steps of Gamblers Anonymous (n = 61). There were no baseline group differences on gambling-relevant variables. Twelve months post-treatment showed no group differences on key gambling variables (eg, frequency, abstinence rates, money wagered) in an analysis of completers. Participants who attended more sessions and chose an initial abstinent treatment goal appeared to achieve better outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10550490802138830

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mixed results were identified for treatment goal in two different studies, whereby abstinence and controlled gambling were associated with positive treatment outcomes.

    “Lastly, mixed results were identified for treatment goal in two different studies, whereby abstinence (Toneatto & Dragonetti, 2008) and controlled gambling (Ladouceur, Lachance, & Fournier, 2009) were associated with positive treatment outcomes.”
  • Toneatto & Dragonetti (2008) indicated that an abstinence goal was associated with more successful post-treatment and medium-term treatment outcomes.

    “another study (Toneatto & Dragonetti, 2008) indicating that an abstinence goal was associated with more successful post-treatment and medium-term treatment outcomes.”
  • In the systematic review, treatment goal (abstinence) was examined as a predictor of medium-term outcomes in three studies, and the table reports 33% of significant results.

    “| Treatment goal | Abbott et al. (2013) | x | x | x | 3 | 33% |”

    From Predictors of outcomes of psychological treatments for disordered gambling: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Toneatto and Dragonetti (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toneatto, T., & Dragonetti, R.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Toneatto, Tony
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
298-303
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W1969070347
Cited by
85
References
16
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
problem gambling, cognitive behavioral therapy, Gamblers Anonymous, community-based treatment, treatment effectiveness, gambling frequency
MeSH terms
Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Self-Help Groups, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review