Cited by 34Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Behavioral couples therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Nilsson, Anders, Magnusson, Kristoffer, Carlbring, Per, Andersson, Gerhard, Hellner, Clara·2020·Addiction

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims There is evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective for treating problem gambling (PG). Some research points to the possible benefits of involving concerned significant others (CSOs) in treatment. This study compared the efficacy of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) and CBT for both the gambler and the CSO. Design Two parallel‐group randomized controlled study comparing two different internet‐based treatments for PG. Follow‐up measures were conducted at treatment finish, and at 3‐, 6‐ and 12‐month post‐treatment. Setting Stockholm, Sweden. Participants A total of 136 problem gamblers and 136 CSOs were included in the study: 68 gamblers and 68 CSOs for each treatment condition. The gamblers were on average 35.6 years old and 18.4% were female. CSOs were on average 45.3 years old and 75.7% were women. Interventions A treatment based on BCT was compared with a CBT intervention. Both treatments were internet‐based, with 10 therapist‐guided self‐help modules accompanied by weekly telephone and e‐mail support from a therapist. CSOs were given treatment in the BCT condition, but not in the CBT condition. Measurements The primary outcome measures were time‐line follow‐back for gambling (TLFB‐G) and the NORC Diagnostic Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS) for problem gamblers, corresponding to DSM‐IV criteria for pathological gambling. Secondary outcomes measures were the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder seven‐item scale (GAD‐7), the Relation Assessment Scale Generic (RAS‐G), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), the Inventory of Consequences of Gambling for the Gambler and CSO (ICS) and adherence to treatment for both the problem gambler and the CSO. Findings The outcomes of both gambler groups improved, and differences between the groups were not statistically significant: TLFB‐G: multiplicative effect = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.30;4.31); NODS: multiplicative effect = 0.80, 95%, 95% CI = 0.24;2.36. BCT gamblers began treatment to a higher proportion than CBT gamblers: P = 0.002. Conclusions Differences in the efficacy of internet‐based behavioral couples therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment of problem gambling were not significant, but more gamblers commenced treatment in the behavioral couples therapy group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.14900

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Involving significant others in the treatment enhances adherence.

    “as well as the relevance of involving significant others in the treatment to enhance adherence (Nilsson et al., 2019).”

    From Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as Nilsson et al., 2019

    The Discussion says the trial only partially supports improved adherence with a concerned significant other: gamblers in couples therapy completed slightly more modules, but those in individual CBT returned more follow-up measures. The Conclusions say adherence might increase, so the claim states a tentative, mixed finding too definitively. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [76]Nilsson A., Magnusson K., Carlbring P., Andersson G., Gumpert C. H. Effects of added involvement from concerned significant others in internet‐delivered CBT treatments for problem gambling: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011974. PMC5051398 27670519

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nilsson, A., Magnusson, K., Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., & Hellner, C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nilsson, Anders
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-08
Volume
115
Issue
7
Pages
1330-1342
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2991348149
Cited by
34
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
problem gambling, behavioral couples therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, online therapy, concerned significant others, gambling addiction, medication adherence, anxiety, alcohol consumption, relationship quality, treatment discontinuation, gambling consequences, treatment efficacy comparison, PHQ-9, generalized anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Sweden, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Couples Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review