Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 624

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation

Open access
Thorson, Emily·2016·Political Communication

Abstract

Across three separate experiments, I find that exposure to negative political information continues to shape attitudes even after the information has been effectively discredited. I call these effects “belief echoes.” Results suggest that belief echoes can be created through an automatic or deliberative process. Belief echoes occur even when the misinformation is corrected immediately, the “gold standard” of journalistic fact-checking. The existence of belief echoes raises ethical concerns about journalists’ and fact-checking organizations’ efforts to publicly correct false claims.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.2307/2132187 · DOI
  2. Amazeen M., 2013, New America Foundation Media Policy Initiative Research Paper
  3. 10.1037/h0077720 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1521/soco.1985.3.3.235 · DOI
  5. Berinsky A. J., 2012, Rumors, truths, and reality: A study of political misinformation
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00504.x · DOI
  7. Carr S., 2012, Columbia Journalism Review.
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00935.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00608.x · DOI
  10. 10.1037/xap0000028 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3758/MC.38.8.1087 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fazio R. H., 1995, Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences
  15. 10.1111/jcom.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221 · Paper page
  18. Graves, L. (in press). Deciding what's true: The fact-checking movement in American journalism . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  19. Gurevitch M., 1990, Democracy and the mass media
  20. 10.1080/15348421003738769 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/poq/nft080 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0002716298560001011 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ladd J. M., 2012, Why Americans hate the media and how it matters, 10.1515/9781400840359 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lodge M., 2011, Cambridge handbook of experimental political science
  26. Lodge M., 2006, Feeling politics
  27. 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2202/1540-8884.1354 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nyhan B., 2015, American Journal of Political Science
  31. 10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1177/0146167202282008 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/08913811.2013.843872 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/15205430903470532 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/1958364 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 624

Metadata

Authors
Thorson, E.
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
460-480
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W1482406218
Cited by
624
References
9
FWCI
64.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187
The paper
Thorson, E. (2016). Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.