Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in EducationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service Interactions

From AI adoption to underperformance? Investigating the impact of interactive AI tools on student outcomes in higher education

Castro-Lopez, Adrian, El Abed, Mehdi, Cervero, Antonio, Álvarez-Blanco, Lucía·2026·European Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This study explores the paradoxical effects of interactive AI tools on university students’ academic performance. Although technologies such as chatbots and virtual assistants are designed to enhance learning through personalised experiences, inadequate integration into curricula may lead to adverse outcomes. Grounded in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT-2), this research examines determinants of students’ behavioural intention to use AI tools and their subsequent impact on academic achievement. Data collected from 407 students across Spanish and French universities reveal that performance expectancy, social influence, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit significantly predict intention to use, whereas effort expectancy and facilitating conditions do not. Importantly, actual usage of these tools shows a statistically significant negative association with academic performance, suggesting that unstructured adoption can be counterproductive. These findings underscore the need for institutional strategies to ensure pedagogically sound integration of AI technologies. While students perceive AI as a means to improve outcomes, improper use may result in lower grades. The study offers critical implications for higher education, highlighting the necessity of balancing technological innovation with effective instructional design to maximise learning benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21568235.2026.2620686

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scholars are concerned about genAI's overall effects on academic performance as well as capacities for reading and thinking critically, exercising evaluative judgement, thinking creatively and independently, and collaborating.

    “Scholars are concerned about genAI's overall effects on academic performance (Castro-Lopez et al., 2026) as well as capacities for reading and thinking critically (Dguidegue, 2025;Olsson, 2026;Rahman et al., 2025), exercising evaluative judgement (Bearman et al., 2024), thinking creatively and independently (Isiaku et al., 2024;Newell et al., 2024;Xia et al., 2024), and collaborating (Xia et al.,”

    From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Castro-Lopez et al., 2026

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Falk, R. F., and N. B. Miller. 1992. A Primer for Soft Modeling. University of Akron Press.
  2. Kang, H. 2022. “Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Native Speaker Interlocutors on ESL Learners’ Speaking Ability and Affective Aspects.” Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning 25 (2): 9–43.
  3. Kharina, O. 2023, September. “Successful Practices of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Educational Activities.” In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, edited by M. E. Aure, U. R. Cukierman, E. V. Vendrell, and E. Tovar, 511–529. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  4. Rega, A., R. Di Fuccio, and E. Inderst. 2024, May. “Learning Enhancer Tools: A Theoretical Framework to Use AI Chatbot in Education and Learning Applications.” In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, edited by H. Degen and S. Ntoa, 409–419. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  5. Ringle, C. M., S. Wende, and J. M. Becker. 2024. SmartPLS 4. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com.
  6. Rouhiainen, L. 2018. Artificial Intelligence: 101 Things You Must Know Today about our Future. Vol. 1. Lasse Rouhiainen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castro-Lopez, A., El Abed, M., Cervero, A., & Álvarez-Blanco, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oviedo
  • ESCE Business School, OMNES Education
Venue
European Journal of Higher Education
Published
2026-01-28
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 2156-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-8243
OpenAlex
W7125973135
Cited by
3
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
25.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
chatbots, virtual assistants, academic performance, UTAUT2, performance expectancy, social influence, hedonic motivation, price value, habit, AI integration in curriculum, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review