Cited by 28Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The role of therapist support on effectiveness of an internet-based modular self-help intervention for adjustment disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Eimontas, Jonas, Gegieckaite, Goda, Dovydaitiene, Migle, Mazulyte, Egle, Rimsaite, Zivile, Skruibis, Paulius, Zelviene, Paulina, Kazlauskas, Evaldas·2018·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjustment disorder is among the most often diagnosed mental health disorders. Still, there is a lack of specific interventions available for adjustment disorder. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test if an internet-based self-help intervention for adjustment disorder could be effective without therapist involvement. DESIGN: A parallel group randomized controlled trial design was used to test the effectiveness of the Brief Adjustment Disorder Intervention (BADI) - an internet-based intervention for adjustment disorder. METHODS: In total 1077 participants were randomized into two conditions: BADI intervention and BADI intervention with therapist support. The main outcome measures were symptoms of adjustment disorder and well-being. RESULTS: Pre-intervention to post-intervention adjustment disorder effect size for the BADI intervention group was d = 0.64, and for the BADI with therapist support group the effect size was d = 0.53. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supported the effectiveness of the BADI intervention. Our findings also indicated that adding therapist support to the standard BADI intervention did not significantly improve the outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2017.1385065

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eimontas, J., Gegieckaite, G., Dovydaitiene, M., Mazulyte, E., Rimsaite, Z., Skruibis, P., Zelviene, P., & Kazlauskas, E.
Affiliations
  • Vilnius University (LT)
  • Department of Clinical and Organizational Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Department of General Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
Corresponding author
Eimontas, Jonas
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2017-10-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
146-158
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2764166761
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research Council of Lithuania (MIP-079/2014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adjustment disorder, internet-based self-help intervention, therapist support, psychological well-being, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychology, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review