Cited by 202Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Adjustment Disorders as Stress Response Syndromes: A New Diagnostic Concept and Its Exploration in a Medical Sample

Open access
Maercker, Andreas, Einsle, Franziska, Köllner, Volker·2007·Psychopathology

Abstract

Objective: Adjustment disorders (AD) are an ill-defined category in the present diagnostic nomenclature. We propose a new diagnostic model that describes AD as particular forms of stress response syndrome, in which intrusions, avoidance of reminders and failure to adapt are the central processes and symptoms. In line with the existing classification, the description of AD subtypes is included. Backgrounds on existing psychopathological models of stress response disorders are outlined. Methods: Data from a clinical sample of patients with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (n = 160, mean age 63 years, 90% males) are investigated. Results: The items tapping the individual symptoms meet psychometric requirements for diagnostic applications. The diagnostic algorithm chosen indicates a 17% prevalence of AD in the sample. The subtype most commonly diagnosed is AD with mixed emotional features (41%). In a subsample, diagnostic sensitivity was 0.58 and specificity 0.81 in relation to traditional AD cases diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. By applying the most strongly conservative exclusion rule analogous to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the AD prevalence was reduced to 9%. Conclusion: The new AD concept is theory driven and shows methodological soundness. Its application to further samples is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000099290

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prevalence rates for adjustment disorders range from 7.1% in patients with breast cancer to 12% in a consultation-liaison psychiatry service and to 17% in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

    “Prevalence rates for adjustment disorders range from 7.1 % in patients with breast cancer [8] to 12 % in a consultation-liaison psychiatry service [9] and to 17 % in patients with cardiovascular diseases [10].”

    From Immediate help through group therapy for patients with somatic diseases and depressive or adjustment disorders in outpatient care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. (2015) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Prevalence of AD and Its Subtypes section reports adjustment disorder in 16.9% of the sample, supporting the rounded 17% figure. But the Participants section identifies the sample specifically as patients with implanted defibrillators at a specialist cardiology clinic; the finding does not establish that prevalence for patients with cardiovascular diseases generally. The 7.1% and 12% figures have separate citations and are not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Casey P, Dowrick C, Wilkinson G: Adjust- ment disorder -fault line in the psychiatric glossary. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 179: 479-481.
  2. Brewin CR, Dalgleish T, Joseph S: A dual rep- resentation theory of posttraumatic stress dis- order. Psychol Rev 1996; 23: 339-376.
  3. Foa EB, Steketee G, Rothbaum BO: Behavior- al/cognitive conceptualization of post-trau- matic stress disorder. Behav Ther 1989; 20: 155-176.
  4. Yehuda R: Post-traumatic stress disorder. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 108-114.
  5. Maercker A, Müller J: Social acknowledge- ment as a victim or survivor. J Trauma Stress 2004; 17: 345-351.
  6. Statistisches Bundesamt (ed): Statistical Year- book 2003 for the Federal Republic of Ger- many. Stuttgart, Metzler-Poeschel, 2003. 32 Maercker A: Psychotherapy in Old Age and Clinical Gerontopsychology. Berlin, Springer, 2002, pp 27-45.
  7. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders. J Pers Dis 1995; 9: 83-91.
  8. Maercker A, Schützwohl M: Assessment of post-traumatic stress reactions: the impact of event scale-revised. Diagnostica 1998; 44: 130-141.
  9. Einsle F, Köllner V, Ende C, Neumann K, Strasser R, Maercker A: Assessment inventory for adjustment disorders: first results. Psycho- ther Psychosom Med Psychol 2004; 54: 88-89.
  10. Maercker A, Michael T, Fehm L, Becker ES, Margraf J: Age of traumatisation as predictor of PTSD or major depression in young wom- en . Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 482-487.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maercker, A., Einsle, F., & Köllner, V.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2007
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
135-146
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2042418558
Cited by
202
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adjustment disorder, stress response syndromes, diagnostic model, intrusion symptoms, prevalence, sensitivity and specificity, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Terminology as Topic, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Defibrillators, Implantable, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review