Cited by 55Digital Mental Health InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

My Disaster Recovery: a pilot randomized controlled trial of an Internet intervention

Open access
Steinmetz, Sarah E., Benight, Charles C., Bishop, Sheryl L., James, Lori E.·2012·Anxiety, Stress & Coping

Abstract

This pilot study tested the efficacy of the My Disaster Recovery (MDR) website to decrease negative affect and increase coping self-efficacy. Fifty-six survivors of Hurricane Ike were recruited from a larger study being conducted at the University of Texas Medical Branch at the first anniversary of the storm. Restricted randomization was used to assign participants to the MDR website, an information-only website, or a usual care condition. Group×time interactions indicated that MDR reduced participant worry more than the other conditions. A similar trend was also identified for depression. Both websites were accessed a small to moderate amount and participants reported mixed satisfaction for both websites. Although the effect sizes for worry and depression were in the moderate to large range, small sample size and timing of the intervention qualify the findings. These preliminary findings encourage further evaluation of MDR with a larger, demographically diverse sample and indicate that the MDR website might be helpful in reducing worry and depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2011.604869

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinmetz, S. E., Benight, C. C., Bishop, S. L., & James, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Benight, Charles C.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Published
2012-09
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
593-600
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2068963962
Cited by
55
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r41mh082498-02)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R41 MH082498, R41MH082498-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Hurricane Ike, disaster survivors, online intervention, worry, depression, coping self-efficacy, negative affect, post-traumatic stress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Disasters, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Texas, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Self Efficacy, Internet, Cyclonic Storms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review