Cited by 185Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Internet-Based Exposure and Behavioral Activation for Complicated Grief and Rumination: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Eisma, Maarten C., Boelen, Paul A., van den Bout, Jan, Stroebe, Wolfgang, Schut, Henk A.W., Lancee, Jaap, Stroebe, Margaret S.·2015·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness and feasibility of therapist-guided Internet-delivered exposure (EX) and behavioral activation (BA) for complicated grief and rumination. Forty-seven bereaved individuals with elevated levels of complicated grief and grief rumination were randomly assigned to three conditions: EX (N=18), BA (N=17), or a waiting-list (N=12). Treatment groups received 6 homework assignments over 6 to 8weeks. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that EX reduced complicated grief, posttraumatic stress, depression, grief rumination, and brooding levels relative to the control group at posttreatment (d=0.7-1.2). BA lowered complicated grief, posttraumatic stress, and grief rumination levels at posttreatment (d=0.8-0.9). At 3-month follow-up, effects of EX were maintained on complicated grief and grief rumination (d=0.6-1.2), and for BA on complicated grief, posttraumatic stress, and grief rumination (d=0.8-0.9). EX reduced depression more strongly than BA (d=0.6). Completers analyses corroborated results for EX, and partially those for BA, but no group differences were detected. BA suffered from high dropout (59%), relative to EX (33%) and the waiting-list (17%). Feasibility appeared higher for EX than BA. Results supported potential applicability of online exposure but not behavioral activation to decrease complicated grief and rumination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.007

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure treatments including exercises to confront thoughts about permanence of separation reduced complicated grief symptoms relative to waitlist and active control groups, with large effects.

    “Exposure treatments, including exercises to confront oneself with thoughts about permanence of separation from the deceased, reduced CG symptoms relative to waitlist and active control groups, yielding large effects (Boelen et al., 2007; Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015)”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015

    The Exposure section describes exercises involving avoided aspects of the loss, and the main analyses report a large reduction in complicated grief symptoms relative to the waitlist control (d = 0.8). The copy does not specifically describe an exercise about the permanence of separation. In “Exposure Versus Behavioral Activation at Posttest and Follow-up,” it reports no significant difference in complicated grief outcomes between exposure and the active behavioral-activation group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RCTs on CBT demonstrated that CBT treatments yield moderate to large effects on grief rumination and depressive rumination.

    “RCTs on CBT further demonstrated the importance of rumination by showing that CBT treatments yield moderate to large effects on grief rumination and depressive rumination (Boelen et al., 2011; Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015

  • An RCT demonstrated in an intention-to-treat analysis that a module of behavioral activation led to large reductions of complicated grief symptoms relative to a waitlist group.

    “Causal evidence for a role of depressive avoidance in CG was provided in an RCT of Eisma, Boelen, et al. (2015), which demonstrated in an intention-to-treat analysis that a module of behavioral activation led to large reductions of CG symptoms relative to a waitlist group.”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma, Boelen, et al. (2015)

  • RCTs demonstrated that exposure for complicated grief causes reductions in rumination.

    “and RCTs demonstrated that exposure for CG causes reductions in rumination (Boelen et al., 2007; Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015

  • Only one RCT demonstrated that exposure versus waitlist reduced depressive rumination.

    “Moreover, only one RCT demonstrated that exposure (vs. waitlist) reduced depressive rumination (Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma, Boelen, et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NMD.0b013e3182392aae · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisma, M. C., Boelen, P. A., van den Bout, J., Stroebe, W., Schut, H. A. W., Lancee, J., & Stroebe, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Eisma, Maarten C.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
729-748
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W428237933
Cited by
185
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw (91208009)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
complicated grief, behavioral activation, bereavement, post-traumatic stress, depression, brooding, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment feasibility, dropout
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review