The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network
Abstract
Using an existential-phenomenological approach, this paper describes how women with breast cancer experience the giving and receiving of social support in a computer-mediated context. Women viewed their experiences with the computer-mediated support group as an additional and unique source of support in facing their illness. Anonymity within the support group fostered equalized participation and allowed women to communicate in ways that would have been more difficult in a face-to-face context. The asynchronous communication was a frustration to some participants, but some indicated that the format allowed for more thoughtful interaction. Motivations for seeking social support appeared to be a dynamic process, with a consistent progression from a position of receiving support to that of giving support. The primary benefits women received from participation in the group were communicating with other people who shared similar problems and helping others, which allowed them to change their focus from a preoccupation with their own sickness to thinking of others. Consistent with past research is the finding that women in this study expressed that social support is a multidimensional phenomenon and that their computer-mediated support group provided abundant emotional support, encouragement, and informational support. Excerpts from the phenomenological interviews are used to review and highlight key theoretical concepts from the research literatures on computer-mediated communication, social support, and the psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Murray, E., Burns, J., See Tai, S., Lai, R., & Nazareth, I. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub4 · Cited by 722
Receiving social support online: implications for health education
White, M. (2001) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/16.6.693 · Cited by 606
Seeking Support on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Breast Cancer Groups
Bender, J. L., Jimenez-Marroquin, M.-C., & Jadad, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1560 · Cited by 438
Young students' use of the Internet for mental health information and support
HORGAN, Á., & SWEENEY, J. (2010) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01497.x · Cited by 303
Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R., & Levine, J. M. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145329 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Bret R. Shaw, F. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-159
- ISSN
- 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0415
- OpenAlex
- W2119692984
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/108107300406866
- The paper
- Bret R. Shaw, F. M. (2000). Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107300406866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.