Cited by 439Social Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media and Politics

Seeking Support on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Breast Cancer Groups

Open access
Bender, Jacqueline L, Jimenez-Marroquin, Maria-Carolina, Jadad, Alejandro R·2011·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social network sites have been growing in popularity across broad segments of Internet users, and are a convenient means to exchange information and support. Research on their use for health-related purposes is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the purpose, use, and creators of Facebook groups related to breast cancer. METHODS: We searched Facebook (www.Facebook.com) using the term breast cancer. We restricted our analysis to groups that were related to breast cancer, operated in English, and were publicly available. Two of us independently extracted information on the administrator and purpose of the group, as well as the number of user-generated contributions. We developed a coding scheme to guide content analysis. RESULTS: We found 620 breast cancer groups on Facebook containing a total of 1,090,397 members. The groups were created for fundraising (277/620, 44.7%), awareness (236, 38.1%), product or service promotion related to fundraising or awareness (61, 9%), or patient/caregiver support (46, 7%). The awareness groups as a whole contained by far the most members (n = 957,289). The majority of groups (532, 85.8%) had 25 wall posts or fewer. The support oriented groups, 47% (27/57) of which were established by high school or college students, were associated with the greatest number of user-generated contributions. CONCLUSIONS: Facebook groups have become a popular tool for awareness-raising, fundraising, and support-seeking related to breast cancer attracting over one million users. Given their popularity and reach, further research is warranted to explore the implications of social network sites as a health resource across various health conditions, cultures, ages, and socioeconomic groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1560

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bender, J. L., Jimenez-Marroquin, M.-C., & Jadad, A. R.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Bender, Jacqueline L
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2011-02-04
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e16
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095995897
Cited by
438
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 27
FWCI
36.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
breast cancer, Facebook groups, social network sites, online support, patient support, fundraising, awareness raising, user-generated content, health information seeking
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Fund Raising, Health Promotion, Humans, Peer Group, Social Support, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review