Cited by 12Enzyme Production and CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationAdvanced Scientific Research Methods

Production of highly active fungal milk-clotting enzyme by solid-state fermentation

Chinmayee, Cirium V., Vidya, Cheral, Rani, Amsaraj, Singh, Sridevi Annapurna·2019·Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology

Abstract

Cheese production is projected to reach 20 million metric tons by 2020, of which 33% is being produced using calf rennet (EC 3.4.23.4). There is shortage of calf rennet, and use of plant and microbial rennets, hydrolyze milk proteins non-specifically resulting in low curd yields. This study reports fungal enzymes obtained from cost effective medium, with minimal down streaming, whose activity is comparable with calf and Mucor rennet. Of the fifteen fungi that were screened, Mucor thermohyalospora (MTCC 1384) and Rhizopus azygosporus (MTCC 10195) exhibited the highest milk-clotting activity (MCA) of 18,383 ± 486 U/ml and 16,373 ± 558 U/ml, respectively. Optimization exhibited a 33% increase in enzyme production (30 g wheat bran containing 6% defatted soy meal at 30 °C, pH 7) for M. thermohyalospora. The enzyme was active from pH 5–10 and temperature 45–55 °C. Rhizopus azygosporus exhibited 31% increase in enzyme production (30 g wheat bran containing 4% defatted soy meal at 30 °C, pH 6) and the enzyme was active from pH 6–9 at 50 °C. Curd yields prepared from fungal enzyme extract decreased (5–9%), when compared with calf rennet and Mucor rennet. This study describes the potential of fungal enzymes, hitherto unreported, as a viable alternative to calf rennet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10826068.2019.1630647

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chinmayee, C. V., Vidya, C., Rani, A., & Singh, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Central Food Technological Research Institute (IN)
  • Department of Protein Chemistry and Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, India;
Corresponding author
Singh, Sridevi Annapurna
Venue
Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology
Published
2019-06-20
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
858-867
ISSN
  • 1082-6068 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2297
OpenAlex
W2953038309
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University Grants Commission
  • Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Keywords
milk-clotting enzyme, solid-state fermentation, cheese production, curd yield, wheat bran substrate, enzyme production optimization, enzyme activity
MeSH terms
Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Industrial Microbiology, Mucor, Rhizopus, Substrate Specificity, Temperature, Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review