Cited by 81Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchMental Health and Patient InvolvementMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Perception of occupational balance by people with mental illness: A new methodology

Eklund, Mona, Argentzell, Elisabeth·2016·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Aims The aims were to (i) investigate initial construct validity of a tool for assessment of time allocation in occupational balance, and (ii) describe perceived occupational balance and its relationship with socio-demographics, well-being, and personal recovery among people with mental illness. Methods Satisfaction with Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO-OB) was administered to 226 persons. SDO-OB reflects balance in five occupational domains: work, leisure, home chores, self-care, and overall occupational balance. Indicators for assessing construct validity were: satisfaction with everyday occupations, occupational value, symptom severity, and psychosocial functioning. For the second aim, the data collection included socio-demographics, life quality, self-esteem, self-mastery, and personal recovery. Results Occupational balance ratings indicated the participants were either under-occupied or in balance. Few were over-occupied. Feeling in balance was related to greater well-being and recovery compared with being under-occupied. Risk factors for under-occupation were younger age (in relation to work), and higher education (in relation to overall balance). Conclusions Associations with the indicators suggest initial construct validity. The SDO-OB is promising for assessment of occupational balance among people with mental illness. Being under-occupied was detrimental to well-being and recovery, and this indicates the importance of offering more occupational opportunities for people with mental illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/11038128.2016.1143529

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eklund, M., & Argentzell, E.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Eklund, Mona
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2016-02-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
304-313
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W2287260174
Cited by
81
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet (K2009-69X-20067-04-3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
occupational balance, mental illness, construct validity, time allocation, well-being, personal recovery, self-esteem, self-control, work values, symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, quality of life, employment opportunities
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Male, Occupations, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Self Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review