Cited by 78Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender, Feminism, and Media

Why did she send it in the first place? Victim blame in the context of ‘revenge porn.’

Open access
Mckinlay, Tahlee, Lavis, Tiffany·2020·Psychiatry Psychology and Law

Abstract

'Revenge porn' or 'cyber rape' occurs when intimate images that were previously sent with permission are leaked to a wider audience without consent. This research investigated the perceptions that individuals form about 'revenge porn' victims, aiming to gain more understanding from a victimisation perspective as a first step towards improving victim outcomes. One hundred and twenty-two individuals were presented with a scenario depicting a leaked intimate image with a female victim. Two distinct nudity levels: low (lingerie) and high (bare-chest, breasts exposed) were included, and participants' responses to the Sexual Double Standards Scale were analysed to determine whether acceptance of the traditional sexual double standard was correlated with victim perception. Results indicated that victims were perceived as more promiscuous and more blameworthy when they were more naked, and by participants with more traditional gender roles. There is a need for policy to address potential stigma directed at 'revenge porn' victims.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734977

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Celizic, M. (2009). Her teen committed suicide over ‘sexting’. Today, NBC News. [Google Scholar]
  2. Citron, D.K., & Franks, M.A. (2014). Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 345. [Google Scholar]
  3. Folderauer, K.M. (2014). Not all is fair (use) in love and war: Copyright law and revenge porn. University of Baltimore Law Review, 44, 321. [Google Scholar]
  4. Giroux, A.M. (2011). Sexting: Connections to sexual and social development (Honours Thesis). Retrieved from http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/144355/1/azu_etd_mr_2011_0080_sip1_m.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gong, L., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Sexting and slut-shaming: Why prosecution of teen selfsexters harms women. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 13, 577. [Google Scholar]
  6. Imbesi, R. (2008). CASA house sexual assault prevention program for secondary schools (SAPPSS): Report. Melbourne: CASA House. Retrieved from http://www.casahouse.com.au/index.php?page_id=137. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lunceford, B. (2012). Naked politics: Nudity, political action, and the rhetoric of the body: Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
  8. Muehlenhard, C.L., & Quackenbush, D.M. (1998). Sexual Double Standard Scale. Handbook of sexuality-related measures, 186–188. [Google Scholar]
  9. Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2015). Digital harassment and abuse of adult Australians: A summary report. Melbourne: RMIT University and La Trobe University. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mckinlay, T., & Lavis, T.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mckinlay, Tahlee
Venue
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Published
2020-05-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
386-396
ISSN
  • 1321-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-1687
OpenAlex
W3034303776
Cited by
78
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
revenge porn, victim blaming, victim perceptions, sexual double standard, gender roles, nudity, sexual victimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review