Cited by 85Digitalization, Law, and RegulationCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The Real Threat of Deepfake Pornography: A Review of Canadian Policy

Karasavva, Vasileia, Noorbhai, Aalia·2021·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Deepfakes may refer to algorithmically synthesized material wherein the face of a person is superimposed onto another body. To date, most deepfakes found online are pornographic, with the people depicted in them rarely consenting to their creation and publicization. Deepfakes leave anyone with an online presence vulnerable to victimization. As a testament to policy often being reactionary to antisocial behavior, current Canadian legislation offers no clear recourse to those who are victimized by deepfake pornography. We aim to provide a critical review of the legal mechanisms and remedies in place, including criminal charges, defamation, copyright infringement laws, and injunctive relief that could be applied in deepfake pornography cases. To combat deepfake pornography, we suggest current laws to be expanded to include language specific to falsely created pornography without the explicit consent of all depicted persons. We also discuss the extent to which host websites are responsible for vetting the uploaded content on their platforms. Finally, we present a call for action on a societal and research level to deal with deepfakes and better support victims of deepfake pornography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2020.0272

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Legal protection against deception via deepfakes is rather limited in most countries.

    “In this study, when it comes to legal responses to deception via deepfakes, we found that legal protection is rather limited in most countries (Karasavva & Noorbhai, 2021; Langa, 2021; O'Donnell, 2021).”

    From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Karasavva & Noorbhai, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karasavva, V., & Noorbhai, A.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Karasavva, Vasileia
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
203-209
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W3139324720
Cited by
85
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
57.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
deepfake pornography, deepfakes, Canadian law, consent, criminal liability, defamation, copyright infringement, injunctions, platform liability, content moderation, victim support, cyber victimization
MeSH terms
Canada, Erotica, Female, Humans, Deception, Male, Video Recording, Crime Victims, Young Adult, Policy, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review