The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
Open accessAbstract
We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with higher conspiracy belief. In Study 1 (N = 202) participants were more likely to agree with a range of conspiracy theories if they also tended to attribute intentionality and agency to inanimate objects. As predicted, this relationship accounted for the link between education level and belief in conspiracy theories. We replicated this finding in Study 2 (N = 330), whilst taking into account beliefs in paranormal phenomena. These results suggest that education may undermine the reasoning processes and assumptions that are reflected in conspiracy belief.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“(2) make sense of their environment [33][34][35]”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and the tendency to perceive agency and intentionality where it does not exist (Douglas et al., 2016).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and lower levels of education (Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Journal of the National Medical Association
(2010) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30622-2 · Cited by 5,338
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232 · cited 4×
“For example, exposure to anti-vaccine conspiracy theories decreases people’s intentions to vaccinate (Jolley & Douglas, 2014b), an effect mediated by feelings of powerlessness, disillusionment and mistrust.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Coady D., 2006, Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate
- Douglas K. M., 2015, The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200)
- Plomin R. S., 1997, Political paranoia
- Swami V., 2010, The Psychologist, 23, 560
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 412
Conspiracy Theories in Post-Soviet Russia
Yablokov, I. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0024 · Cited by 33
Polls, Plots, and Party Politics
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0020 · Cited by 28
A call to action for librarians: Countering conspiracy theories in the age of QAnon
Beene, S., & Greer, K. (2021) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102292 · Cited by 28
“One method to counter conspiracy ideation has been to incorporate analytical thinking throughout education (Swami et al., 2014; Douglas et al., 2016; Oliver & Wood, 2014b).”
The Creativity of Conspiracy Theories
Bonetto, É., & Arciszewski, T. (2021) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.497 · Cited by 27
Conspiracy Theories Through a Cross-Cultural Lens
Imhoff, R. (2022) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1175 · Cited by 27
(2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0001 · Cited by 29
Pisl, V., Volavka, J., Chvojková, E., Cechová, K., Kavalirova, G., & Vevera, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717960 · Cited by 17
“Given that the effect of paranormal thinking on belief in conspiracy theories is reduced by education (Douglas et al., 2016), the expected negative effect of dissociation experience on the vaccination intentions might possibly be present in the general population, although it was not reflected in our highly educated s…”
BackgroundThe Collective Conspiracy Mentality in Poland
Soral, W., Cichocka, A. K., Bilewicz, M., & Marchlewska, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0025 · Cited by 30
Some problems with particularism
Harris, K. R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03948-9 · Cited by 24
System Threat during a Pandemic: How Conspiracy Theories Help to Justify the System
Mao, J., van Prooijen, J., Yang, S., & Guo, Y. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211057001 · Cited by 23
Applications of machine learning for COVID-19 misinformation: a systematic review
Sanaullah, A. R., Das, A., Das, A., Kabir, M. A., & Shu, K. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00921-9 · Cited by 28
How Conspiracy Theories Spread
DeWitt, D., Atkinson, M., & Wegner, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0021 · Cited by 24
Leveaux, S., Nera, K., Fagnoni, P., & Klein, P. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.6201 · Cited by 22
“, 2018) and a number of cognitive biases (e.g., Brotherton & French, 2014; Douglas et al., 2016; Wagner-Egger et al., 2018).”
BackgroundBiological agency: a concept without a research program
DiFrisco, J., & Gawne, R. (2024) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1093/jeb/voae153 · Cited by 33
Achimescu, V., Sultănescu, D., & Sultănescu, D. C. (2021) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2021.1924746 · Cited by 22
“…Silva, Vegetti, and Littvay 2017), mistrust in institutions (Freeman et al. 2020), media consumption (Mitchell et al. 2020), low education (Douglas et al. 2016; Freeman and Bentall 2017; Van Prooijen 2017), low income (Freeman and Bentall 2017), and male gender (Cassese, Farhart, and…”
BackgroundWagner-Egger, P., Adam-Troian, J., Cordonier, L., Cafiero, F., & Bronner, G. (2022) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.556 · Cited by 20
What We Mean When We Say “Conspiracy Theory”
Walker, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0003 · Cited by 23
Frenken, M., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104383 · Cited by 23
Conspiracy Theories and Religion
Robertson, D. G. C., & Dyrendal, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0028 · Cited by 21
Mapping the Narrative Ecosystem of Conspiracy Theories in Online Anti-vaccination Discussions
Introne, J. E., Korsunska, A., Krsova, L., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/3400806.3400828 · Cited by 21
“Carrying on this tradition, studies within the last several decades have found that people who maintain CTheories feel like they are disempowered and lack control, are poorly educated, ideologically eccentric, and do not think analytically [11, 32, 40, 42].”
BackgroundChanging minds about minds: Evidence that people are too sceptical about animal sentience
Leach, S., Sutton, R. M., Dhont, K., Douglas, K. M., & Bergström, Z. M. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105263 · Cited by 30
“Contemporary psychological research corroborates the view, showing that people imbue intentionality not only to animals but to minimal stimuli such as animated geometric shapes (Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016; Heider & Simmel, 1944; Waytz, Cacioppo, & Epley, 2010).”
Self-citationCosgrove, T. J., & Murphy, C. P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164725 · Cited by 26
“Moreover, a link between lower levels of education and conspiracy theory endorsement is also well established (Douglas et al., 2016; van Prooijen, 2017; Georgiou et al., 2020; Knobel et al., 2022).”
BackgroundInsight in the Conspiracist’s Mind
de Cruys, S. V., Bervoets, J., Gadsby, S., Gijbels, D., & Poels, K. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231203145 · Cited by 22
“The conventional reasoning is that the ease with which conspiracy ideas are processed is boosted through the use of patterns that align with our intuitive, familiar ways of interpreting the world, namely centered on agents with intentions and emotions (Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundConspiracy theory beliefs in the adolescent population: A systematic review
Byrne, A., Martin, D., Jones, C., Galbraith, N. D., & Mercer, T. (2024) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12316 · Cited by 20
Gkinopoulos, T., Elbæk, C. T., & Mitkidis, P. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273172 · Cited by 16
“[15] posit that conspiracy theories entail a moral evaluation component, on the grounds that traumatic and frightful events originate from malevolent elites [16] and, thus, trigger a moral reasoning relevant to the actual understanding of conspiracy theories [17].”
BackgroundJastrzębski, J., & Chuderski, A. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101705 · Cited by 23
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0016 · Cited by 22
Self-citationEducation and conspiracy beliefs: A replication of van Prooijen (2017)
Mikušková, E. B. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4037 · Cited by 20
Probability and conspiratorial thinking
Kovic, M., & Füchslin, T. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3408 · Cited by 19
Nera, K., Pantazi, M., & Klein, O. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00684 · Cited by 20
“, 2017), as well as on generic cognitive biases associated with conspiracy mentality and CT endorsement (e.g., van Prooijen and van Dijk, 2014; Brotherton and French, 2015; Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSternisko, A., Cichocka, A. K., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wvqes · Cited by 18
Fernbach, P. M., & Bogard, J. E. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12662 · Cited by 17
Integrating Non-Psychiatric Models of Delusion-Like Beliefs into Forensic Psychiatric Assessment.
Pierre, J. M. (2019) · PubMed · doi:10.29158/jaapl.003833-19 · Cited by 19
Dyrendal, A., & Hestad, K. (2021) · Approaching Religion · doi:10.30664/ar.107485 · Cited by 9
(2015) · Bloomsbury Sigma eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781472944528.0007 · Cited by 16
Schöpfer, C., Abatista, A., Fuhrer, J., & Cova, F. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111900 · Cited by 16
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
Yendell, A., & Herbert, D. (2022) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904 · Cited by 17
Conspiracy theories explained by a cheating detection mechanism
Aubert-Teillaud, B., & Vaidis, D. C. (2023) · Social & Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12876 · Cited by 3
Atkinson, M., & DeWitt, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0008 · Cited by 17
Pennycook, G., Binnendyk, J., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d5fz2 · Cited by 20
Evil perceptions mediate the association between trait anger and generic conspiracy beliefs
Harmon‐Jones, E., & Szymaniak, K. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112303 · Cited by 13
Cordonier, L., & Cafiero, F. (2024) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13374 · Cited by 13
The role of cognitive biases in shaping irrational beliefs: a multi-Study Investigation
Teovanović, P., Purić, D., Živanović, M. M., Lukić, P., Branković, M., Stanković, S., Knežević, G., Lazarević, B., & Žeželj, I. (2024) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2024.2421367 · Cited by 18
“For instance, conspiracist beliefs were found to be related to belief in the paranormal (Bruder et al., 2013; Darwin et al., 2011; Douglas et al., 2016; Drinkwater et al., 2012), specifically superstitiousness (Stieger et al., 2013; Swami et al., 2011), but also to pseudoscientific beliefs (Sunyík…”
McKenzie-McHarg, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0004 · Cited by 18
Deprived, Radical, Alternatively Informed
Ziegele, M., Resing, M., Frehmann, K., Jackob, N., Jakobs, I., Quiring, O., Schemer, C., Schultz, T., & Viehmann, C. (2022) · European Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.47368/ejhc.2022.205 · Cited by 15
“…researchers have discussed the possibility that a lower education is associated with a stronger tendency to the illusory pattern perception (Douglas et al., 2016), which can be an attempt to understand complex social processes despite a lack of cognitive skills (Douglas et al., 2019;…”
BackgroundMedia Marginalization of Racial Minorities
Orr, M., & Husting, G. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0005 · Cited by 16
Tam, L., & Kim, S. (2023) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102354 · Cited by 19
Revisiting Nature’s “Unifying Patterns”: A Biological Appraisal
Lecointre, G., Aish, A., Améziane, N., Chekchak, T., Goupil, C., Grandcolas, P., Vincent, J. F. V., & Sun, J. (2023) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics8040362 · Cited by 15
“Human beings can be susceptible to thinking that there is agency or intention within or beyond nature, a cognitive bias called “hypersensitive agency detection” [4,5] or “intentionality bias” [5,6].”
BackgroundOn the Democratic Problem of Conspiracy Politics
Moore, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0007 · Cited by 14
Seeing thought: a cultural cognitive tool
Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2020) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-020-00059-0 · Cited by 23
Conspiracy thinking as situation model construction
Zwaan, R. A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101413 · Cited by 14
How does economic inequality shape conspiracy theories? Empirical evidence from China
Zeng, Z., Tian, C., Mao, J., van Prooijen, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, S., Xie, X., & Guo, Y. (2023) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12689 · Cited by 13
Kunst, J. R., Gundersen, A. B., Krysińska, I., Piasecki, J., Wójtowicz, T., Ryguła, R., van der Linden, S., & Morzy, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51740-9 · Cited by 15
COVID-19, Mental Health and Its Relationship with Workplace Accidents
Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., Álvarez-Risco, A., Villalobos-Alvarez, D., Carhuapoma, M., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022) · International Journal of Mental Health Promotion · doi:10.32604/ijmhp.2022.020513 · Cited by 13
“Conspiracy theories can be defined as the efforts made by a specific group, usually a minority, to understand the cause of an event by creating arguments based on secret group conspiracies rather than trying to understand them as random processes or natural flow [32].”
BackgroundThe psychological study of conspiracy theories: Strengths and limitations
van Prooijen, J., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101465 · Cited by 13
“I Know Things They Don’t Know!” The Role of Need for Uniqueness in Belief in Conspiracy TheoriesPreprint
Lantian, A., Dominique Muller, B., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zm9a6 · Cited by 13
Self-citationCoady, D. (2021) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.1917364 · Cited by 13
Gkinopoulos, T., Pagliaro, S., Pacilli, M. G., Bilewicz, M., Teresi, M., & Ballone, C. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3002 · Cited by 14
Kont, J., Elving, W. J. L., Broersma, M., & Bozdağ, Ç. (2024) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2023-0078 · Cited by 17
“However, in all cases, these connections are explained by more influential mediating factors such as knowledge or epistemic beliefs (e. g., Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundJedinger, A., & Siegers, P. (2024) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048324000130 · Cited by 17
“…of invisible powers that operate beyond the realm of (direct) human experience (Ladini, 2022), tend to establish agency and intentionality in unrelated events (Douglas et al ., 2016; Galliford and Furnham, 2017), or share the rejection of scientific research and evidence ( Ł owicki et al ., 2022).”
BackgroundFortuna, A. M. D., & Picione, R. D. L. (2024) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x241246760 · Cited by 14
“…al., 2018, 2019, 2021, 2023), conspiracy theories and conspiracy thinking are overspreading (Brotherton, 2015; Butter, 2014; Douglas & Sutton, 2023; Douglas et al., 2016, 2017, 2019; ) and their impact over society is considered harmful enough (Biddlestone et al., 2022; Brotherton, 2015; Goreis &…”
How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa
Bendixen, T. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00634-4 · Cited by 14
Are we smart enough to remember how smart animals are?
Leach, S., Sutton, R. M., Dhont, K., Douglas, K. M., & Bergström, Z. M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001401 · Cited by 13
Self-citationPennycook, G., Binnendyk, J., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251338358 · Cited by 17
“…tend to lack analytic thinking skills (Bayrak et al., 2025; Binnendyk & Pennycook, 2022; Swami et al., 2014), and people may come to conspiracies through intuitive biases such as hypersensitive agency detection (Douglas et al., 2016) or illusory pattern perception (van Prooijen et al., 2018).”
Seeing minds – a signal detection study of agency attribution along the autism-psychosis continuum
Lisøy, R. S., Biegler, R., Haghish, E. F., Veckenstedt, R., Moritz, S., & Pfuhl, G. (2022) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546805.2022.2075721 · Cited by 9
Buchmayr, F. (2019) · Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1007/s11614-019-00385-w · Cited by 11
Students’ Views on the Covid-19 pandemic: Attitudes, Representations, and Coping Mechanisms
Assante, G. M., & Candel, O. S. (2020) · Postmodern Openings · doi:10.18662/po/11.4/240 · Cited by 12
“Moreover, better developed critical thinking would help individuals to be less judgemental towards others, reducing both social stigma and other-blame strategies (Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundConspiracy Theories in U.S. History
Olmstead, K. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0019 · Cited by 10
Factors affecting conspiracy theory endorsement in paranoia
Greenburgh, A., Liefgreen, A., Bell, V., & Raihani, N. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211555 · Cited by 9
Cultural Evolutionary Psychology of Belief
Bendixen, T., & Purzycki, B. G. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009001021.015 · Cited by 9
Beyer, H., & Herrberg, N. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Religion Gesellschaft und Politik · doi:10.1007/s41682-023-00147-2 · Cited by 10
Tam, L., & Lee, H. (2023) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642231174330 · Cited by 13
“Moreover, individuals who have lower education levels tend to be more likely to believe in a range of conspiracy theories (Douglas et al., 2016).”
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0010 · Cited by 12
Meuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.587 · Cited by 9
The Societal Impacts of Covid-19: A Transnational Perspective
Bozkurt, V., Dawes, G. D., Gülerce, H., & Westenbroek, P. (2021) · Istanbul University Press eBooks · doi:10.26650/b/ss49.2021.006 · Cited by 19
Johnson, T. J., Wallace, R., & Lee, T. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80071-597-420221005 · Cited by 14
Meuer, M., Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2903 · Cited by 14
Staszak, S., Maciejowska, J., Urjasz, W., Misiuro, T., & Cudo, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214789 · Cited by 9
“Some research showed that conspiracy thinking may be negatively correlated with the level of analytical thinking and with education [23,26].”
BackgroundVerschwörungsmentalität und Antisemitismus
Imhoff, R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31701-0_4 · Cited by 1
Furnham, A. F., & Horne, G. (2022) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.5093/jwop2022a2 · Cited by 9
“There has been a great increase of studies on CTs (Barron et al., 2014; Brotherton & French, 2014; Douglas et al., 2016; Imhoff & Lamberty, 2017; van Prooijen et al., 2015).”
BackgroundCiacchella, C., Veneziani, G., Bagni, C., Campedelli, V., CASALE, A. D., & Lai, C. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12081302 · Cited by 9
Khalaf, M. A., & Shehata, A. M. K. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01425-7 · Cited by 9
The Conspiratorial Style in Turkish Politics
Nefes, T. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0026 · Cited by 9
Conspiracy Thinking, Tolerance, and Democracy
Smallpage, S. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0012 · Cited by 9
Comprehending Covidiocy Communication
Spitzberg, B. H. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119751809.ch2 · Cited by 13
Of Precarity and Conspiracy: Introducing A Socio-Functional Model of Conspiracy BeliefsPreprint
Adam‐Troian, J., Chayinska, M., Paladino, M. P., Uluğ, Ö. M., Vaes, J., & Wagner‐Egger, P. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mnfrd · Cited by 9
Müller, P., & Hartmann, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36230-0 · Cited by 9
Role of Conspiracy Mentality and Paranormal Beliefs in Predicting Conspiracy Beliefs Among Neopagans
Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E. O., & Lewis, J. (2018) · International Journal for the Study of New Religions · doi:10.1558/ijsnr.36716 · Cited by 8
The Effect of Brooding About Societal Problems on Conspiracy Beliefs: A Registered Report
Liekefett, L., Sebben, S., & Becker, J. C. (2024) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.92995 · Cited by 9
Lin, X., Yan, L., & Xu, J. B. (2024) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2024.2323163 · Cited by 8
“Studies in the major line of reasoning have revealed a negative association between age and conspiracy beliefs (Douglas et al., 2016; Masarwa et al., 2024).”
Kim, Y., & Lim, H. D. (2024) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2024.2333549 · Cited by 8
“In addition, some researchers have found that lower levels of education (Douglas et al., 2016) and income (J. E. Uscinski & Parent, 2014), as well as being male and being unemployed (Freeman & Bentall, 2017), are positively related to belief in conspiracy theories (Jolley et al., 2020).”
The Status Foundations of Conspiracy Beliefs
Roscigno, S. (2024) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241237654 · Cited by 8
“Regarding SES and education in particular, most studies find that higher levels of education are associated with lower levels of conspiracy belief (Douglas et al. 2016; Freeman and Bentall 2017; Uscinski and Parent 2014).”
Gebauer, F., Raab, M. H., & Carbon, C. (2016) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3279 · Cited by 8
Metacognitive Labeling of Contentious Claims: Facts, Opinions, and Conspiracy Theories
Brotherton, R., & Son, L. K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644657 · Cited by 10
On the Rationality of Conspiracy Theories
Cohnitz, D. (2018) · Croatian Journal of Philosophy · Cited by 8
The Truth Is Around Here Somewhere
Bost, P. R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0018 · Cited by 8
Why the Powerful (in Weak States) Prefer Conspiracy Theories
Radnitz, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0023 · Cited by 8
Conspiracy Theories about Infectious Diseases: An Introduction
Hong, Y., Chan, H., & Douglas, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211057657 · Cited by 9
Self-citationCurious about threats: Morbid curiosity and interest in conspiracy theories in US adults
Scrivner, C., & Stubbersfield, J. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12682 · Cited by 7
Critical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
Bensley, D. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108684354.005 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Essex (GB)
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Douglas, Karen M.
- Venue
- Thinking & Reasoning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-77
- ISSN
- 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0708
- OpenAlex
- W2282522361
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 84.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
- Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- conspiracy beliefs, agency detection, intention attribution, educational attainment, supernatural beliefs, inanimate objects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review