The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
Open accessAbstract
We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with higher conspiracy belief. In Study 1 (N = 202) participants were more likely to agree with a range of conspiracy theories if they also tended to attribute intentionality and agency to inanimate objects. As predicted, this relationship accounted for the link between education level and belief in conspiracy theories. We replicated this finding in Study 2 (N = 330), whilst taking into account beliefs in paranormal phenomena. These results suggest that education may undermine the reasoning processes and assumptions that are reflected in conspiracy belief.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“(2) make sense of their environment [33][34][35]”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and the tendency to perceive agency and intentionality where it does not exist (Douglas et al., 2016).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas et al., 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and lower levels of education (Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Journal of the National Medical Association
(2010) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30622-2 · Cited by 5,338
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249397 · Cited by 2,392
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019265 · Cited by 2,093
The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232 · cited 4×
“For example, exposure to anti-vaccine conspiracy theories decreases people’s intentions to vaccinate (Jolley & Douglas, 2014b), an effect mediated by feelings of powerlessness, disillusionment and mistrust.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Coady D., 2006, Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate
- Douglas K. M., 2015, The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200)
- Plomin R. S., 1997, Political paranoia
- Swami V., 2010, The Psychologist, 23, 560
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 412
Zeng, Z., Ding, Y., Zhang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095396 · Cited by 7
“Previous studies have shown that subjective social class, income, and educational background are significantly and negatively correlated with beliefs in conspiracies [32,33].”
BackgroundGoing beyond simplicity: Using machine learning to predict belief in conspiracy theories
Brandenstein, N. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2859 · Cited by 9
What is wrong with conspiracy beliefs?
Alper, S., & Yılmaz, O. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17926.1 · Cited by 7
Siem, B., B. Kretzmeyer, & Stürmer, S. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211052587 · Cited by 5
(2017) · OECD economic surveys. Austria · doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2017-graph59-en · Cited by 9
A Survey of COVID-19 Misinformation: Datasets, Detection Techniques and Open Issues
Ullah, A. R. S., Das, A., Das, A., Kabir, M. A., & Shu, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.00737 · Cited by 9
Arnulf, J. K., & Furnham, A. F. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104156 · Cited by 6
State boredom but not boredom proneness influences judgements of agency
Dadzie, V. B., & Danckert, J. A. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.113024 · Cited by 6
Tayhan, A., Tayhan, E. B., & Büyük, D. Ş. (2025) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.70039 · Cited by 6
“Similarly, Douglas et al. (2016) and Jabkowski, Domaradzki, and Baranowski (2023) found that low education level increases belief in conspiracy theories.”
Conspiracy Theories and Religious Worldviews: Unraveling a Complex Relationship
Hesse, J., & Weidemann, C. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.55 · Cited by 6
Sharples, R., Kamp, A., Dunn, K. M., Denson, N., Nicholas, L., & Ovenden, G. (2025) · Journal of Intercultural Studies · doi:10.1080/07256868.2025.2481391 · Cited by 6
Complementary concepts of disinformation
Seargeant, P. (2022) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac.98.09sea · Cited by 6
Harmon-Jones, E., Szymaniak, K., Sebban, G., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112639 · Cited by 5
Conspiracy beliefs in the context of a comprehensive rationality assessment
Stanovich, K., & Toplak, M. E. (2024) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2024.2368026 · Cited by 6
“Many of these, especially the strong human propensity to infer intentionality and the tendency to rely on a narrative mode of thought, have been discussed in the literature on conspiracy belief (Douglas et al., 2016; Oliver & Wood, 2014; Shermer, 2022; van Prooijen, 2018).”
Durch Gott legitimiert, das „Reich“ zu befreien
Herrberg, N. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Religion Gesellschaft und Politik · doi:10.1007/s41682-021-00072-2 · Cited by 6
“…liegen, da sie nicht als in sich logisches und stringentes Ganzes aufgefasst werden sollten: Verschwörungssemantiken können in Bezug auf ihre unmittelbare Argumentation vielmehr Widersprüche aushalten und sie bisweilen sogar für sich nutzbar machen (vgl. auch Douglas et al. 2016; Wood et al. 2012).”
BackgroundStefkovics, Á., Krekó, P., & Koltai, J. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117149 · Cited by 7
Alqudah, M. A., Al-Shaikh, A. F., Hamouri, S., Haddad, H. K., AbuRashed, S., & Zureikat, Z. A. (2022) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000030836 · Cited by 6
Dispositional and ideological factor correlate of conspiracy thinking and beliefs
Arnulf, J. K., Robinson, C. L., & Furnham, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273763 · Cited by 5
“Those who endorse CTs misattribute a great deal of agency and intentionality to others where it is clearly inappropriate to do so [27].”
BackgroundThe measurement and prediction of conspiracy beliefs
Rose, C. (2017) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17060408 · Cited by 6
de Zavala, A. G., Bierwiaczonek, K., & Ciesielski, P. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2rku3 · Cited by 6
Sullivan‐Bissett, E. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009641883 · Cited by 5
Do Real and Invented Scandals Fuel Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories?
Wagner‐Egger, P., Fernandes, D. D. O., Carrel, J., & Delouvée, S. (2023) · European Journal of Psychology Open · doi:10.1024/2673-8627/a000034 · Cited by 5
Domaradzki, J., Jabkowski, P., & Walkowiak, D. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06057-y · Cited by 5
“…leads to scepticism towards CTs because it lessens the inclination to attribute agency and purpose when none exists and equips individuals with a greater feeling of control over their social environments, making them less eager to believe that complex social issues can have easy answers [51, 54].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Credulity of Conspiracy Theorists
Keeley, B. L. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0029 · Cited by 5
Ük, B., & Bahçekapılı, H. G. (2022) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-022-00047-1 · Cited by 9
“They think of themselves as enlightened because they created alternative explanations and see beyond official ones [13].”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate Change Conspiracy Theories
Räikkä, J. (2023) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_141-1 · Cited by 5
Conspiracy Theory Belief and Education: A Critical Social Analysis
Muscat-Inglott, M. (2023) · The Journal of Social Science · doi:10.30520/tjsosci.1168549 · Cited by 5
Radicalization and violent extremism depend on envy; conspiracy ideation, sometimes
Moncrieff, M., & Liénard, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111354 · Cited by 9
“Both unwarranted attribution of agency and intentionality are coupled with a support for conspiracy theories (Imhoff and Bruder, 2014; Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundTeličák, P., Halama, P., & Kohút, M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05171-2 · Cited by 6
Alper, S., Yelbuz, B. E., & Konukoglu, K. (2023) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.33 · Cited by 5
“…2021; March and Springer, 2019; Uscinski et al., 2022) and indications of low socioeconomic status, such as lower income (Constantinou et al., 2021; Freeman and Bentall, 2017) and lower education level (Douglas et al., 2016; van Prooijen, 2017), are associated with belief in conspiracy theories.”
Do you trust the rumors? Examining the determinants of health‐related misinformation in India
Kapoor, H., Gurjar, S., Mahadeshwar, H., Mehta, N., & Puthillam, A. (2023) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12586 · Cited by 6
Jabkowski, P., Domaradzki, J., & Baranowski, M. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04781-4 · Cited by 5
“…considers country-level contextual variables, other in fl uential factors, such as cultural nuances, political climates, and historical contexts, are not extensively explored but might impact belief systems and medical conspiracy theory prevalence (Douglas et al., 2015; Lazi ć & Ž e ž elj, 2021).”
Influentialde Melo, L. W. S., Passos, M. M., & Salvi, R. F. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências · doi:10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u275294 · Cited by 5
Kolinsky, R., Justino, J., Arnal, C., Tossonian, M., Rautu, I.-S., Bouali, H., Morais, J., & Klein, O. (2021) · Cadernos de Linguística · doi:10.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n1.id319 · Cited by 7
Sternisko, A., Delouvée, S., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104357 · Cited by 5
“The Conspiracy Theory Research Base is a database of academic literature on conspiracy theories and other closely related topics (Douglas, 2021; Douglas et al., 2016).”
Conspiracy Theories About the Pandemic of COVID-19 and Their Function on the Greek Internet
Κακάμπουρα, Ρ., & Nounanaki, A.-L. (2022) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4461-0.ch004 · Cited by 5
The Conspiracy Theory Pyramid Scheme
Goertzel, T. G. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0015 · Cited by 5
Don’t Trust the Scientists! Rejecting the Scientific Consensus “Conspiracy”
Josh Pasek, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0013 · Cited by 5
[Conspiracy narratives in the context of the coronavirus pandemic].
Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.1007/s00278-021-00498-2 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy theories through the lens of collective memory
Wagoner, B., Jørgensen, M. S., & Pahuus, K. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102227 · Cited by 4
Pummerer, L., Winter, K., Sassenberg, K., & Fischer, H. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2025.2563541 · Cited by 4
“…of two events as more probable than the occurrence of one (i.e. conjunction fallacy, Brotherton and French, 2014), jumping to conclusions (Pytlik et al., 2020), or to perceive agency (i.e. hypersensitive agency detection) and patterns in randomness (Douglas et al., 2016; van Prooijen et al., 2018).”
Exploring the Extremes: The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Populism on Conspiracy Beliefs in Austria
Hofmann, D. (2024) · The social science · doi:10.3390/socsci13100558 · Cited by 2
“…range from a variety of factors such as lack of control, anxiety, and uncertainty (Swami et al. 2016; Van Prooijen 2019; Van Prooijen and Douglas 2017; Van Prooijen and Jostmann 2013) to seeing patterns and agency in random events (Brotherton 2015; Brotherton and French 2015; Douglas et al. 2016).”
Conspiracy Beliefs and Monothematic Delusions: A Case for De-pathologizing
Ichino, A., & Sullivan‐Bissett, E. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00881-w · Cited by 4
“…leads us to favour explanations in which intentional agents play a key role and any relevant fact or event is seen as the result of deliberate intentional actions, rather than of mere coincidence, mechanical causes, or impersonal abstract forces (Brotherton & French, 2015; Douglas et al., 2016).”
The social psychology of conspiracy theories: Key insights and future challenges
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2025) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.10.004 · Cited by 6
Self-citationCognitive Biases Associated With Specific and Generalized Beliefs in Conspiracy Theory
Frost, P. J., Simard, A., Iraci, L., Stack, S., Gould‐Faulkner, C., Alexakos, A., Fernandez, M., & Oza, S. (2025) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70045 · Cited by 5
Heslen, J. J. (2020) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2020.3 · Cited by 4
“For instance, research suggests that political conservatives and less (Singer & Brooking, 2018). educated individuals are more likely to believe in con-spiracies (Douglas et al., 2015; Fessler et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLee, H., Perez, L. A., & Kim, J. (2022) · Online Media and Global Communication · doi:10.1515/omgc-2022-0035 · Cited by 4
Do stress and anxiety lead to belief in conspiracy theories?
Fox, N., & Williams, M. N. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17925.1 · Cited by 4
Testing the underlying structure of unfounded beliefs about COVID-19 around the world
Brzóska, P., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J., Nowak, B., Jonason, P., Sedikides, C., Adamovic, M., Atitsogbe, K. A., Ahmed, O., Azam, U., et al. (2023) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2023.2259539 · Cited by 4
“Conspiracy implies hostile intentions of others (Douglas et al., 2016), and conspiracy believers are on alert for hostile others, thus increasing the likelihood of perceiving hostile intent in other when there is none (Van Prooijen & Van Vugt, 2018).”
BackgroundBeliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
Jin, S., Pradel, F., Zilinsky, J., & Theocharis, Y. (2024) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2024.008 · Cited by 5
“Some work suggests that this is because education improves people’s reasoning (Douglas et al. 2016), rational thinking (Mancosu et al. 2017), or exposure to information (Van Mulukom et al. 2022).”
BackgroundHow group life makes personal agency possible
Greenaway, K. H. (2024) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.001 · Cited by 6
Conspiratorial thinking in the workplace: how it happens and why it matters
Tam, L., Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2024) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-12-2023-0139 · Cited by 6
Sullivan‐Bissett, E. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2077717 · Cited by 4
Rizeq, J. (2020) · YorkSpace (York University) · Cited by 4
Nera, K., Wagner‐Egger, P., Bertin, P., Douglas, K. M., & Klein, O. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/s37vy · Cited by 4
Self-citationConspiracy Theories: A Cultural Evolution Theory approachPreprint
Stubbersfield, J. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hqkju · Cited by 4
Meuer, M., & Imhoff, R. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/74ugt · Cited by 6
Conspiracy Worldviews and Political Violence: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction With DemocracyPreprint
Bonetto, É., Adam‐Troian, J., & Arciszewski, T. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e83nx · Cited by 4
Furnham, A. F., & Leka, J. (2023) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2023.149084 · Cited by 3
Ma, D., & Lu, M. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edae006 · Cited by 4
Analysis of child development facts and myths using text mining techniques and classification models
Tajrian, M., Rahman, A., Kabir, M. A., & Islam, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36652 · Cited by 4
“They operate over the Internet to harm people [28,29].”
BackgroundThe Ecological View of Practical Argumentation
Chouraqui, F. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10170-y · Cited by 3
“This could be a sense of agency (Douglas et. al.”
Kiszkiel, Ł., Sowa, P., Laskowski, P. P., Alimowski, M., Moniuszko-Malinowska, A., Szczerbiński, Ł., Sołomacha, S., Skonieczna‐Żydecka, K., Samochowiec, J., Solmi, M., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99991-w · Cited by 3
Correlatos valorativos de crenças em teorias da conspiração
Rezende, A. T., Gouveia, V. V., do Nascimento, A. M., Vilar, R., & Oliveira, K. G. (2019) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 3
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. P. (2022) · Minerva Psychiatry · doi:10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02166-x · Cited by 3
Baker, M. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003134633 · Cited by 3
Literacy in a post-truth world
Kolinksy, R., Arnal, C., Bouali, H., Justino, J., Tossonian, M., Rautu, I.-S., Morais, J., Pantazi, M., & Klein, O. (2022) · Signo · doi:10.17058/signo.v47i90.17870 · Cited by 3
Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. L. (2023) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299231212165 · Cited by 3
“Or an insistence that human agency, rather than accident or impersonal social forces, is the cause of important events (Douglas et al., 2016).”
BackgroundOnline disinformation: an economic analysis
Lisi, G. (2023) · Economics and Business Letters · doi:10.17811/ebl.12.4.2023.266-276 · Cited by 3
“…indeed, among the main factors that influence the belief in disinformation and online disinformation there is a lower education or digital literacy (Douglas et al., 2016; Craft et al., 2017; Kahne and Bowyer, 2017; Flynn et al., 2017; Tandoc et al., 2018; Leeder, 2019; Pop and Ene, 2019; Reuter et…”
BackgroundFacebook Usage and Outgroup Intolerance in Myanmar
Samet, O., Arriola, L. R., & Matanock, A. M. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2333408 · Cited by 9
“Experimental evidence shows that people with higher education who engage with online media are less likely to endorse conspiracy theories (Douglas et al., 2016), more likely to hold accurate beliefs about their news environment (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017), and more likely to engage in the analytical…”
Poier, S., & Nikodemska‐Wołowik, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102519 · Cited by 4
Conspiracy theories and geography: Who gets to say where is power?
Ridgway, V. (2025) · Dialogues in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/20438206251316008 · Cited by 3
“…beliefs or ideation as faulty modes of reasoning that satisfy, amongst other things, a disposition towards intuitive thinking, mono-causal explanations and an exaggerated belief in intention and agency (Douglas et al., 2016; van Prooijen and Douglas, 2018; van Prooijen and van Lange, 2014).”
Mao, J., Zeng, Z., Yang, S., Guo, Y., Wang, B., & van Prooijen, J. (2025) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70016 · Cited by 3
“Specifically, in situations with limited information, one may attribute intentionality and agency to understand what happened (Douglas et al., 2016; Hornsey et al., 2023).”
InfluentialThe roles of need frustration and regulatory focus in conspiratorial thinking
Hunsinger, M., & Parker, M. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102188 · Cited by 3
Learning about Conspiracy Theories
Cullen, J. T. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0009 · Cited by 4
de Melo, L. W. S., Passos, M. M., & Salvi, R. F. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências · doi:10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u295313 · Cited by 3
“In certain cases, they can even generate advantageous social consequences, such as encouraging citizens to be more questioning of their politicians and government officials, leading to greater government transparency (Douglas et al., 2016). These observations need to be well demarcated in this context of discussion, w…”
BackgroundInfluentialConspiracy Theory Belief and Conspiratorial Thinking
Farhart, C. E. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.036 · Cited by 3
Mehl, S. (2022) · Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-022-00710-2 · Cited by 4
Influence of fear on anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and behaviour against vaccination
Malas, O. (2023) · Revista de PSICOLOGÍA DE LA SALUD · doi:10.21134/pssa.v11i1.321 · Cited by 3
Ozono, H., & Sakakibara, R. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4142 · Cited by 4
Thakur, N., Cui, S., Patel, K. A., Azizi, N., Knieling, V., Han, C., Poon, A., & Shah, R. (2023) · Computation · doi:10.3390/computation11110234 · Cited by 3
Is Epistemic Trust relevant for Vaccine Hesitancy? A study during the Covid-19 pandemic
Bincoletto, A. F., Nimbi, F. M., Protopapa, G., Lingiardi, V., & Giovanardi, G. (2024) · PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE · doi:10.3280/pds2024-001003 · Cited by 3
Nera, K., Bertin, P., Biddlestone, M., Tagand, M., & Klein, O. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104640 · Cited by 4
Alper, S., Konukoğlu, K., Atalay, E. D., Düzgün, A., & Yılmaz, O. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112765 · Cited by 4
Alper, S., Elcil, T., Karaca, N., Bayrak, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07654-w · Cited by 2
À la recherche de nouvelles traces sociales
Bronner, G., David, P., & Buono, L. D. (2018) · Revue européenne des sciences sociales · doi:10.4000/ress.3988 · Cited by 4
Filer, T. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0027 · Cited by 3
Curious about threats: Morbid curiosity and interest in conspiracy theoriesPreprint
Scrivner, C., & Stubbersfield, J. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7fubx · Cited by 3
Krekó, P., Orosz, G., Faragó, L., & Zsila, Á. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3359277/v1 · Cited by 3
Climate Change Conspiracy Theories
Räikkä, J. (2023) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_141 · Cited by 2
Paranormalism, Voting Intention, and Other Conspiracy Mentality Predictors in Sweden
Tidelius, C. (2024) · Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion · doi:10.33356/temenos.144628 · Cited by 2
“Anthony Lantian, Dominique Muller, Cécile Nurra, and Karen M. Douglas (2016) have developed a single-item measurement of conspiracy mentality, correlated with lengthier scales of conspiracy belief and producing good validity and reliability, which I intended to adopt.”
Adornetti, I., Altavilla, D., Chiera, A., Deriu, V., Gerna, A., Picca, L., & Ferretti, F. (2025) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-025-01282-9 · Cited by 2
“The first result, i.e., a negative correlation between years of education and level of conspiratorial thinking, appears to be consistent with previous research by Douglas et al. ( 2016 ), who found that lower levels of education were associated with higher conspiratorial beliefs.”
Determinants and consequences of belief in Islamophobic conspiracy theories among youth in India
Sharma, S., Shahnawaz, M., & Zafar, M. (2025) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.70053 · Cited by 2
How experience shapes extraordinary beliefs
Elster, E., & Singh, M. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.11.002 · Cited by 2
Zwar, L., König, H., & Hajek, A. (2022) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2102141 · Cited by 2
“Findings before and during the pandemic indicated consistently that younger age is associated with higher, and older age with lower, conspiracy beliefs (De Coninck et al., 2021; Douglas et al., 2016; Duplaga, 2020; earnshaw et al., 2020; Galliford & Furnham, 2017; Green & Douglas, 2018; Kuhn et al., 2021).”
BackgroundVaccine-related conspiracy and counter-conspiracy narratives. Silencing effects
Corbu, N., Buturoiu, R., Frunzaru, V., & Guiu, G. (2023) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2022-0022 · Cited by 2
On Some Factors Contributing to Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Ivančík, R., & Andrassy, V. (2023) · Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.36941/ajis-2023-0056 · Cited by 2
Stubbersfield, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.72 · Cited by 5
Is Education the Best Tool to Fight Disinformation?
Lisi, G. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01725-8 · Cited by 3
“In human and social sciences, education is a key factor in recognising fake news (Craft et al., 2017; Douglas et al., 2016; Flynn et al., 2017; Kahne & Bowyer, 2017; Leeder, 2019; Pop & Ene, 2019; Reuter et al., 2019; Tandoc et al., 2018).”
Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., Hussain, Z., Basile, G., & Bianco, R. (2024) · International Journal of Law and Management · doi:10.1108/ijlma-02-2024-0045 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Essex (GB)
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Douglas, Karen M.
- Venue
- Thinking & Reasoning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-77
- ISSN
- 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0708
- OpenAlex
- W2282522361
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 84.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
- Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (acceptedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- conspiracy beliefs, agency detection, intention attribution, educational attainment, supernatural beliefs, inanimate objects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review