Cited by 119Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Boredom-proneness, loneliness, social engagement and depression and their association with cognitive function in older people: A population study

Conroy, Ronán M., Golden, Jeannette, Jeffares, Isabelle, O'Neill, Desmond, McGee, Hannah·2010·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

In this study, we use data from a population survey of persons aged 65 and over living in the Irish Republic to examine the relationship of cognitive impairment, assessed using the Abbreviated Mental Test, with loneliness, boredom-proneness, social relations, and depression. Participants were randomly selected community-dwelling Irish people aged 65+ years. An Abbreviated Mental Test score of 8 or 9 out of 10 was classified as 'low normal', and a score of less than 8 as 'possible cognitive impairment'. We used clustering around latent variables analysis (CLV) to identify families of variables associated with reduced cognitive function. The overall prevalence of possible cognitive impairment was 14.7% (95% CI 12.4-17.3%). Low normal scores had a prevalence of 30.5% (95% CI 27.2-33.7%). CLV analysis identified three groups of predictors: 'Low social support' (widowed, living alone, low social support), 'personal cognitive reserve' (low social activity, no leisure exercise, never having married, loneliness and boredom-proneness), and 'sociodemographic cognitive reserve' (primary education, rural domicile). In multivariate analysis, both cognitive reserve clusters, but not social support, were independently associated with cognitive function. Loneliness and boredom-proneness are associated with reduced cognitive function in older age, and cluster with other factors associated with cognitive reserve. Both may have a common underlying mechanism in the failure to select and maintain attention on particular features of the social environment (loneliness) or the non-social environment (boredom-proneness).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2010.487103

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low engagement in social activity has been associated with poor cognitive outcomes.

    “Social isolation (DiNapoli, Wu, & Scogin, 2014;Shankar, Hamer, McMunn, & Steptoe, 2013), feelings of loneliness (Conroy, Golden, Jeffares, O'Neill, & McGee, 2010;Ellwardt, Aartsen, Deeg, & Steverink, 2013;Fung, Leung, & Lam, 2011;Gerst-Emerson, Shovali, & Markides, 2014;Gow et al., 2013;O'Luanaigh et al., 2012;Shankar et al., 2013;Tilvis et al., 2004), and low engagement in social activity (Barnes”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Conroy et al., 2010

  • Other studies have found no association between living alone and poorer scores on measures of global cognitive function, memory, IQ, verbal fluency, and numeracy.

    “Other studies have found no association between living alone and poorer scores on measures of global cognitive function (Conroy et al., 2010;Gow et al., 2013;Mahoney, Eisner, Havighurst, Gray, & Palta, 2000;Wang, He, & Dong, 2015;Yeh & Liu, 2003), memory, IQ (Gow et al., 2013), verbal fluency, and numeracy (Mazzuco et al., 2016).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Conroy et al., 2010

  • Feelings of loneliness have been associated with poor cognitive outcomes.

    “Social isolation (DiNapoli, Wu, & Scogin, 2014;Shankar, Hamer, McMunn, & Steptoe, 2013), feelings of loneliness (Conroy, Golden, Jeffares, O'Neill, & McGee, 2010;Ellwardt, Aartsen, Deeg, & Steverink, 2013;Fung, Leung, & Lam, 2011;Gerst-Emerson, Shovali, & Markides, 2014;Gow et al., 2013;O'Luanaigh et al., 2012;Shankar et al., 2013;Tilvis et al., 2004), and low engagement in social activity (Barnes”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Conroy et al., 2010

  • Most studies of living alone and cognitive function have been cross-sectional.

    “Most of these studies have been crosssectional (Conroy et al., 2010;Gow et al., 2007Gow et al., , 2013;;Wang et al., 2015;Yeh & Liu, 2003).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Conroy et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conroy, R. M., Golden, J., Jeffares, I., O'Neill, D., & McGee, H.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Conroy, Ronán M.
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
463-473
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2122122907
Cited by
119
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
boredom proneness, loneliness, social engagement, depression, cognitive impairment, cognitive function, older adults, cognitive reserve, social support, interpersonal relationships, attention, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Boredom, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Ireland, Loneliness, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review