Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning opportunities at work as predictor for recovery and health

Rau, Renate·2006·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

One of the principles of good job design is to make jobs that are conducive to personal development and to health. One of the ways in which jobs can facilitate personal development is to provide learning opportunities. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that learning opportunities at work are positively related to health. The jobs of 185 men and women were evaluated and assessed for the learning opportunities provided by these jobs. Health was measured (a) as allostasis, operationalized as the body's ability to recover after load, and (b) as self-reports about mental health and life satisfaction. Objective indicators of allostasis were reduction of nocturnal heart rate and reduction of blood pressure after load. Subjective indicators were the ability to recover and absence of sleep disturbances. Linear and logistic regression analyses showed that learning opportunities were significantly related to a healthy cardiovascular behaviour with a strong reduction of nocturnal heart rate and blood pressure after a working day (allostasis). However, learning opportunities were only related to the objectively measured health variables, but not to self-reported data of health. The study findings suggest that designing jobs which provide learning opportunities is very important for workers' health. Thus job design can improve both personal development and health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13594320500513905

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning opportunities at work (e.g., decision authority, responsibility, feedback) were positively associated with nocturnal recovery of heart rate and blood pressure.

    “The facilitating role of job resources is well illustrated by Rau (2006), who indicated that learning opportunities at work (e.g., decision authority, responsibility, feedback) were positively associated with nocturnal recovery of heart rate and blood pressure.”
  • Job demands were related to impaired ability to relax at home.

    “Further evidence concerning the relationships comes from the study by Sonnentag and Bayer (2005), which showed that high demands on a specific day increased the risk of not being able to detach from work, and from the study by Rau (2006), which also indicated that job demands were related to impaired ability to relax at home.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Appels A., 1997, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, Supplementum, 640, 153
  2. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Becker P., 1989, Trierer Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (TPF)
  4. 10.1024//0170-1789.21.2.113 · DOI
  5. Bergmann B., 2000, Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 2, 138
  6. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000041473.03828.67 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/13594320500513913 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13594320344000093 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(200003)16:2<101::AID-SMI836>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  11. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gerin W., 1995, Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 390, 10.1097/00006842-199507000-00011 · DOI
  14. Goldberg D., 1992, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
  15. Golderberg D., 1988, A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire
  16. Hacker W., 1986, Arbeitspsychologie
  17. Hacker W., 1993, A healthier work environment: Basic concepts and methods of measurement, 42
  18. Hacker W., 2002, International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 58
  19. 10.1080/13594320344000075 · DOI
  20. Hacker W., 1995, Tätigkeitsbewertungssystem (TBS): Verfahren zur Bewertung und Gestaltung von Arbeitstätigkeiten [Task diagnosis survey: A method of job analysis, job evaluation and job design]
  21. Haynes S. H., 1991, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 356, 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.356 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S003329170200586X · DOI
  23. 10.1080/08964289.1990.9934595 · DOI
  24. Kannel W. B., 1967, Annals of Internal Medicine, 67, 48, 10.7326/0003-4819-67-1-48 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322 · DOI
  26. Karasek R., 1990, Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life
  27. 10.1026//1617-6391.2.3.107 · DOI
  28. Leontjew A. N., 1978, Activity, consciousness, and personality
  29. Li B., 1997, Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi, 34, 793, 10.3143/geriatrics.34.793 · DOI
  30. Luczak H., 1987, Enzyklopaedie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Praxisgebiete, Serie III, Wirtschafts-, Organisations- und Arbeitspsychologie, Band 1, 185
  31. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/026783799296165 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80031-0 · DOI
  34. Myrtek M., 1998, Gesunde Kranke—kranke Gesunde. Psychophysiologie des Krankheitsverhaltens [Healthy sick people—sick healthy people: Psychophysiology of sick behaviour]
  35. 1986, Paper presented at the first international conference on Health Promotion
  36. 10.1159/000288986 · DOI
  37. Pickering T., 1997, Research network on socioeconomic status and health
  38. Pohlandt A., 1999, Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren, 515
  39. 10.1037/1076-8998.9.4.322 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.171 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/00207590050171148 · DOI
  42. 10.1026//0932-4089.44.3.129 · DOI
  43. Richter P., 1996, Fragebogen zur Diagnostik belastungs-relevanter Anforderungsbewältigung (FABA)
  44. Rudolph E., 1987, Tätigkeitsbewertungssystem für geistige Arbeit mit/ohne Rechnerunterstützung (TBS-GA)
  45. Salancik K. G., 1977, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 223
  46. Schaarschmidt U., 1997, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 18, 151
  47. Schaarschmidt U., 1998, Handbuch Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung
  48. Schnall P. L., 1998, Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 697, 10.1097/00006842-199811000-00007 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1080/13594320500513939 · DOI
  51. Sowers J. R., 1998, Clinical Chemistry, 44, 1821, 10.1093/clinchem/44.8.1821 · DOI
  52. Spector P. E., 1992, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123
  53. Sterling P., 2004, Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of adaptation, 2
  54. Sterling P., 1988, Handbook of life stress, cognition and health, 629
  55. 10.1080/0267837031000108149 · DOI
  56. Theorell T., 1993, Scandinavian Journal Work Environment and Health, 19, 313, 10.5271/sjweh.1469 · DOI
  57. Theorell T., 1991, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 17, 380, 10.5271/sjweh.1690 · DOI
  58. Ulich E., 2001, Arbeitspsychologie [Work psychology]
  59. Ulich E., 2004, Gesundheitsmanagement in Unternehmen—Arbeitspsycholo-gische Perspektiven. Reihe Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Organisation und Management (SGO-Stiftung)
  60. 10.1016/0022-3999(90)90065-C · DOI
  61. Volpert W., 1983, Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Regulationserfordernissen in der Arbeitstätigkeit (VERA) (Method for the assessment of regulation requirements of jobs (VERA): Handbook and manual)
  62. 10.1080/02678379008256991 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rau, R.
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2006-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
158-180
ISSN
  • 1359-432X
  • 1464-0643
Cited by
44
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review