The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning opportunities at work as predictor for recovery and health
Abstract
One of the principles of good job design is to make jobs that are conducive to personal development and to health. One of the ways in which jobs can facilitate personal development is to provide learning opportunities. Therefore, this study tested the hypothesis that learning opportunities at work are positively related to health. The jobs of 185 men and women were evaluated and assessed for the learning opportunities provided by these jobs. Health was measured (a) as allostasis, operationalized as the body's ability to recover after load, and (b) as self-reports about mental health and life satisfaction. Objective indicators of allostasis were reduction of nocturnal heart rate and reduction of blood pressure after load. Subjective indicators were the ability to recover and absence of sleep disturbances. Linear and logistic regression analyses showed that learning opportunities were significantly related to a healthy cardiovascular behaviour with a strong reduction of nocturnal heart rate and blood pressure after a working day (allostasis). However, learning opportunities were only related to the objectively measured health variables, but not to self-reported data of health. The study findings suggest that designing jobs which provide learning opportunities is very important for workers' health. Thus job design can improve both personal development and health.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learning opportunities at work (e.g., decision authority, responsibility, feedback) were positively associated with nocturnal recovery of heart rate and blood pressure.
“The facilitating role of job resources is well illustrated by Rau (2006), who indicated that learning opportunities at work (e.g., decision authority, responsibility, feedback) were positively associated with nocturnal recovery of heart rate and blood pressure.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Rau (2006)
Job demands were related to impaired ability to relax at home.
“Further evidence concerning the relationships comes from the study by Sonnentag and Bayer (2005), which showed that high demands on a specific day increased the risk of not being able to detach from work, and from the study by Rau (2006), which also indicated that job demands were related to impaired ability to relax at home.”
From Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011) · cites this paper as Rau (2006)
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Sterling, P. (2004) · Allostasis, Homeostasis, and the Costs of Physiological Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316257081.004 · Cited by 353
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Appels A., 1997, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, Supplementum, 640, 153
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471 · DOI · Paper page
- Becker P., 1989, Trierer Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (TPF)
- 10.1024//0170-1789.21.2.113 · DOI
- Bergmann B., 2000, Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 2, 138
- 10.1097/01.PSY.0000041473.03828.67 · DOI
- 10.1080/13594320500513913 · DOI
- 10.1080/13594320344000093 · DOI · Paper page
- Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(200003)16:2<101::AID-SMI836>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
- Gerin W., 1995, Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 390, 10.1097/00006842-199507000-00011 · DOI
- Goldberg D., 1992, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
- Golderberg D., 1988, A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire
- Hacker W., 1986, Arbeitspsychologie
- Hacker W., 1993, A healthier work environment: Basic concepts and methods of measurement, 42
- Hacker W., 2002, International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 58
- 10.1080/13594320344000075 · DOI
- Hacker W., 1995, Tätigkeitsbewertungssystem (TBS): Verfahren zur Bewertung und Gestaltung von Arbeitstätigkeiten [Task diagnosis survey: A method of job analysis, job evaluation and job design]
- Haynes S. H., 1991, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 356, 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.356 · DOI
- 10.1017/S003329170200586X · DOI
- 10.1080/08964289.1990.9934595 · DOI
- Kannel W. B., 1967, Annals of Internal Medicine, 67, 48, 10.7326/0003-4819-67-1-48 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322 · DOI
- Karasek R., 1990, Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life
- 10.1026//1617-6391.2.3.107 · DOI
- Leontjew A. N., 1978, Activity, consciousness, and personality
- Li B., 1997, Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi, 34, 793, 10.3143/geriatrics.34.793 · DOI
- Luczak H., 1987, Enzyklopaedie der Psychologie, Themenbereich D, Praxisgebiete, Serie III, Wirtschafts-, Organisations- und Arbeitspsychologie, Band 1, 185
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/026783799296165 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80031-0 · DOI
- Myrtek M., 1998, Gesunde Kranke—kranke Gesunde. Psychophysiologie des Krankheitsverhaltens [Healthy sick people—sick healthy people: Psychophysiology of sick behaviour]
- 1986, Paper presented at the first international conference on Health Promotion
- 10.1159/000288986 · DOI
- Pickering T., 1997, Research network on socioeconomic status and health
- Pohlandt A., 1999, Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren, 515
- 10.1037/1076-8998.9.4.322 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.171 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207590050171148 · DOI
- 10.1026//0932-4089.44.3.129 · DOI
- Richter P., 1996, Fragebogen zur Diagnostik belastungs-relevanter Anforderungsbewältigung (FABA)
- Rudolph E., 1987, Tätigkeitsbewertungssystem für geistige Arbeit mit/ohne Rechnerunterstützung (TBS-GA)
- Salancik K. G., 1977, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 223
- Schaarschmidt U., 1997, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 18, 151
- Schaarschmidt U., 1998, Handbuch Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung
- Schnall P. L., 1998, Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 697, 10.1097/00006842-199811000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13594320500513939 · DOI
- Sowers J. R., 1998, Clinical Chemistry, 44, 1821, 10.1093/clinchem/44.8.1821 · DOI
- Spector P. E., 1992, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123
- Sterling P., 2004, Allostasis, homeostasis, and the costs of adaptation, 2
- Sterling P., 1988, Handbook of life stress, cognition and health, 629
- 10.1080/0267837031000108149 · DOI
- Theorell T., 1993, Scandinavian Journal Work Environment and Health, 19, 313, 10.5271/sjweh.1469 · DOI
- Theorell T., 1991, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 17, 380, 10.5271/sjweh.1690 · DOI
- Ulich E., 2001, Arbeitspsychologie [Work psychology]
- Ulich E., 2004, Gesundheitsmanagement in Unternehmen—Arbeitspsycholo-gische Perspektiven. Reihe Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Organisation und Management (SGO-Stiftung)
- 10.1016/0022-3999(90)90065-C · DOI
- Volpert W., 1983, Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Regulationserfordernissen in der Arbeitstätigkeit (VERA) (Method for the assessment of regulation requirements of jobs (VERA): Handbook and manual)
- 10.1080/02678379008256991 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators
Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2011) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.524411 · Cited by 282
After work is done: psychological perspectives on recovery from work
Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Sonnentag, S. (2006) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320500513855 · Cited by 232
Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here?
Ilies, R., Aw, S. S. Y., & Pluut, H. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1071422 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Rau, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-180
- ISSN
- 1359-432X
- 1464-0643
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review