Cited by 81Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCognitive Functions and Memory

Evaluating two group programmes of cognitive training in mild-to-moderate AD: is there any difference between a 'global' stimulation and a 'cognitive-specific' one?

Farina, E., Mantovani, F., Fioravanti, R., Pignatti, R., Chiavari, L., Imbornone, E., Olivotto, F., Alberoni, M. +2 more·2006·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of two different group procedures of non-pharmacological treatment in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Thirty-two patients entered the study and were divided in groups of four subjects. We compared recreational activities ('global' stimulation) with a combination of procedural memory training on activities of daily living and neuropsychological rehabilitation of 'residual' functions ('cognitive-specific'). All patients and caregivers were ensured psychological support. Both group treatments were delivered for six weeks. Multidimensional efficacy assessment of functional, behavioural and neuropsychological aspects was performed. Patients receiving 'global' stimulation showed a substantial reduction in behavioural disturbances (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]: frequency p = 0.034; severity p = 0.012); Revised Memory Behaviour Problems Checklist (frequency p = 0.008; reaction p = 0.027), and better performance in the Functional Living Skills Assessment (FLSA), a standardized direct measure of performance in everyday life (p = 0.021) and Verbal Fluency for Letters (p = 0.000). Patients receiving 'cognitive-specific' treatment improved only on the scale evaluating functional competence in daily living (Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients [NOSGER] p = 0.018). At follow-up (six months later), compared with baseline, patients following the 'global' stimulation treatment showed an improvement at caregiver distress on NPI (p = 0.04). No other significant difference was detected. Our results support the contention that a 'global' treatment can lead to a significant improvement in AD patients, both for behavioural and functional aspects. The 'cognitive-specific' treatment we used in this research did not show better efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860500409492

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multidimensional Stimulation Therapy was more effective than a cognitive-specific intervention in improving both behavioral and functional outcomes in AD patients.

    “An Italian group developed the Multidimensional Stimulation Therapy (MST), a multidimensional approach that combined cognitive stimulation, recreational activities, OT and physical exercises, and demonstrated that MST was more effective than a cognitive-specific intervention in improving both behavioral and functional outcomes in AD patients (167, 168).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farina, E., Mantovani, F., Fioravanti, R., Pignatti, R., Chiavari, L., Imbornone, E., Olivotto, F., Alberoni, M., Mariani, C., & Nemni, R.
Affiliations
  • Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Farina, E.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
211-218
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2038759435
Cited by
81
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild to moderate dementia, recreational activities, activities of daily living, neuropsychological rehabilitation, behavioral problems, functional competence, caregiver distress, non-pharmacological treatment, verbal fluency
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Italy, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Recreation, Severity of Illness Index, Program Evaluation, Geriatric Assessment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review