Cited by 35Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthResilience and Mental HealthAging and Gerontology Research

Trajectories of resilience among widows: a latent transition model

Open access
Bennett, Kate Mary, Morselli, Davide, Spahni, Stefanie, Perrig-Chiello, Pasqualina·2020·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2015 we identified three profiles of adaptation following spousal bereavement: Vulnerables; Copers and Resilients (Spahni, Morselli, Perrig-Chiello, & Bennett, 2015). However, adaptation to spousal bereavement is a dynamic process. Thus, we examine the trajectories of the same participants longitudinally over two years. We identify the stability and change in profiles of adaptation to widowhood; probability of stability and change; factors that influence trajectories in profile membership. METHODS: Data stem from a longitudinal questionnaire study of 309 older widowed people. The questionnaire included five measures of well-being, serving as the dependent variables of this analysis, and measures of personal resources and contextual factors, including social support, marital happiness, psychological resilience, and demography. Data was analysed using latent transition analysis of the variables loneliness, hopelessness, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, and subjective health. RESULTS: The analysis replicated the three Wave 1 profiles as the best theoretical fit: Vulnerables; Copers; and Resilients. Stability was most common, but some participants moved to more or less adaptive profiles, the former being more frequent. Younger age, longer time since widowhood, new life perspectives facilitated adaptation. Those transitioning to less adaptive profiles were more likely to be women and older. DISCUSSION: The path to adaptation was not linear. Many of the explanatory variables contributed both to positive and negative adaptation. These include previous caring experience, education, psychological resilience and personal strength. This suggests these explanatory variables do not act in isolation but are likely to interact with each other, and with other, yet not measured, factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2019.1647129

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that did focus on resilience during the 2020 pandemic focused on trait resilience.

    “Those that do focused on trait resilience (see [10] for a discussion).”

    From Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The discussion of resilience in widowed people identifies trait resilience as one approach, alongside stability in wellbeing and adaptation after bereavement (Abstract > Discussion; page unavailable). It does not discuss studies during the 2020 pandemic or establish that those studies focused on trait resilience; searches for pandemic and COVID-19 yielded no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ecological model of resilience has been used in contexts such as older people living in poverty in Colombia, widowhood, chronic health conditions, end-of-life care, and dementia care.

    “Windle and Bennett [21] developed the ecological model of resilience (Fig 1) which was originally developed in relationship to caregiving but has subsequently been used in other contexts, for example amongst older people living in poverty in Colombia [17], widowhood [10], chronic health conditions [22], and caregiving in relationship to end of life care [23] and dementia care [15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén e Muthén.
  2. Schumacher, J. (2003). SWLS - Satisfaction with Life Scale. In J. Schumacher, A. Klaiberg & E. Brähler (Eds.), Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  3. Schumacher, J., Leppert, K., Gunzelmann, T., Straus, B., & Brähler, E. (2005). The resilience scale - A questionnaire to assess resilience as a personality characteristic. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53(1), 16– 39.
  4. Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and con- cept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21, 152– 169.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, K. M., Morselli, D., Spahni, S., & Perrig-Chiello, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Institute of Psychology, University of Berne, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Bennett, Kate Mary
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2019-08-09
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
2014-2021
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2968802253
Cited by
35
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES – Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (125770)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
widowhood, death of a spouse, psychological resilience, older adults, loneliness, hopelessness, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social support, marital satisfaction, worldview
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Widowhood, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review