The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality and domain‐specific risk taking
Abstract
The concept of risk propensity has been the subject of both theoretical and empirical investigation, but with little consensus about its definition and measurement. To address this need, a new scale assessing overall risk propensity in terms of reported frequency of risk behaviours in six domains was developed and applied: recreation, health, career, finance, safety and social. The paper describes the properties of the scale and its correlates: demographic variables, biographical self‐reports, and the NEO PI‐R, a Five Factor personality inventory (N = 2041). There are three main results. First, risk propensity has clear links with age and sex, and with objective measures of career‐related risk taking (changing jobs and setting up a business). Second, the data show risk propensity to be strongly rooted in personality. A clear Big Five pattern emerges for overall risk propensity, combining high extraversion and openness with low neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. At the subscale level, sensation‐seeking surfaces as a key important component of risk propensity. Third, risk propensity differs markedly in its distribution across job types and business sectors. These findings are interpreted as indicating that risk takers are of three non‐exclusive types: stimulation seekers, goal achievers, and risk adapters. Only the first group is truly risk seeking, the others are more correctly viewed as risk bearers. The implications for risk research and management are discus…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concept of sensation or stimulation seeking may explain why some humans take more risks around horses than others.
“In addition, the concept of sensation or stimulation seeking has been given some consideration by researchers [46,60,89] and this may explain why some humans take more risks around horse than others.”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
This study supports previous research of young males being more likely to take 'general risks'.
“This study supports previous research of young males being more likely to take ‘general risks’ [60,61], despite the small survey sample of equestrian males with a mean age of 50 years.”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 · Cited by 3,723
Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258646 · Cited by 2,057
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 1997, A Risk Based Approach to Supervision
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00084.x · DOI
- Browne MW, 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136–62
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.158 · DOI
- Costa PT, 1997, NEO PI‐R and NEO‐FFI Professional Manual
- Digman JM, 1997, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 · DOI · Paper page
- Eysenck HJ, 1973, Eysenck on Extraversion
- Fagley NS, 1997, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 264, 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90041-0 · DOI
- Finucane ML, 2000, Health, Risk and Society, 2, 159, 10.1080/713670162 · DOI · Paper page
- Highhouse S, 1996, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 159, 10.1006/obhd.1996.0014 · DOI
- Hogan J, 1997, Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 849–70
- 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.592 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1994.1067 · DOI
- Kowert PA, 1997, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 611, 10.1177/0022002797041005001 · DOI
- Kühberger A, 1998, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23, 10.1006/obhd.1998.2781 · DOI
- MacCrimmon KR, 1986, Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty
- 10.1080/08870440108405487 · DOI
- McCrae RR, 1997, American Psychologist, 52, 509, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 · DOI · Paper page
- McCrae RR, 1997, Handbook of Personality Psychology, pp. 825–47
- 10.1017/CBO9780511522116 · DOI
- Powell M, 1997, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605, 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00026-3 · DOI
- Rauch A, 2000, International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology 2000, 15, 101
- Robins RW, 2001, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151, 10.1177/0146167201272002 · DOI · Paper page
- Salminen S, 1997, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 33, 10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00059-0 · DOI
- Segal B, 1973, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 135, 10.1037/h0035594 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00003-2 · DOI
- Sitkin SB, 1992, Academy of Management Review, 17, 9, 10.5465/amr.1992.4279564 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256844 · DOI
- Slovic P, 2000, The Perception of Risk
- Ungemack JA, 1994, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10, 38, 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30645-7 · DOI
- Vollrath M, 2002, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185, 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00080-0 · DOI
- Weber EU, 1997, Management Science, 43, 123, 10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123 · DOI
- Weber EU, 2002, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 1, 10.1002/bdm.414 · DOI · Paper page
- Weinstein E, 1969, Psychological Reports, 24, 499, 10.2466/pr0.1969.24.2.499 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01229.x · DOI
- Zuckerman M, 1974, Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 7, pp. 79–148
- 10.1111/1467-6494.00124 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0040995 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12183 · Cited by 1,231
Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency
Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013341 · Cited by 1,136
Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0034418 · Cited by 630
When Words Sweat: Identifying Signals for Loan Default in the Text of Loan Applications
Netzer, O., Lemaire, A., & Herzenstein, M. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719852959 · Cited by 238
Wagner, M., Huinink, J., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2019) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2019.40.1 · Cited by 40
Johnstad, P. G. (2021) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2020.1842569 · Cited by 29
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Cold hearts playing with fire: the dark triad, risk-taking and empathy.
Yap, J. Y., & Elizaveta, B. (2021) · Journal of Health and Translational Medicine · doi:10.22452/jummec.vol24no2.11 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton‐O'Creevy, M., & Willman, P.
- Affiliations
- a London Business School , Regent's Park , London NW1 4SA, UK
- b Kingston Business School , UK
- c Open University Business School , UK
- d Said Business School , Oxford, UK
- Venue
- Journal of Risk Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-176
- ISSN
- 1366-9877
- 1466-4461
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review