Cited by 356Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Neuropsychological Studies of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research Since 1995

Frencham, Katherine A. R., Fox, Allison M., Maybery, Murray T.·2005·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

A meta-analysis conducted by Binder, Rohling and Larrabee established a relationship between mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and small reductions in cognitive functioning in individuals assessed more than 3 months post-injury. As a follow-up, this study summarized similar research that (1) was published since the previous meta-analysis, and (2) included data collected at any stage post-injury. An extensive literature search revealed 17 suitable studies from which effect sizes were aggregated. The overall effect size was g = 0.32, p < .001. Speed of processing measures had the largest effect, g = 0.47, p < .001. The merging of post-acute effect sizes with those reported in Binder et al.'s review yielded a nonsignificant result, g = 0.11. Time since injury was found to be a significant moderator variable, with effect sizes tending to zero with increasing time post injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803390490520328

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls.

    “These findings align with prior studies and provide some of the strongest evidence to date that in unselected mTBI cases, lower cognitive performance does not chronically persist relative to controls (Belanger et al., 2005; Binder et al., 1997; Frencham et al., 2005; Karr et al., 2014; Rohling et al., 2011; Schretlen & Shapiro, 2003).”
  • Objective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury.

    “In general, objective, late cognitive deficits after mTBI have been elusive to document at the group level, with multiple, meta-analytic reviews concluding insufficient evidence for deleterious effects of mTBI on objective cognitive assessment beyond the first few months post-injury”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frencham, K. A. R., Fox, A. M., & Maybery, M. T.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Frencham, Katherine A. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2005-04
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
334-351
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W2128469349
Cited by
356
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, cognitive function, neuropsychological deficits, processing speed, time since injury, effect size
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review