Cited by 29Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

The Vigilance, Orienting, and Executive Attention Networks in 4-Year-Old Children

Hrabok, Marianne, Kerns, Kimberly A., Müller, Ulrich·2007·Child Neuropsychology

Abstract

The present study examined the development of lower and higher order forms of attention during the preschool years. Lower forms of attention were assessed with tasks that primarily engaged the attention functions of vigilance and orienting. Higher, executive forms of attention were assessed with tasks that involved inhibition and working memory. The findings revealed that performance improved significantly with age on measures of inhibition and orienting. Results are discussed in the context of the development of attentional networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13825580600977224

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computer-based tasks suitable for preschoolers have been designed based on previously validated measures of attention and executive function, including Go/No-Go, response inhibition, delayed alternation, self-ordered pointing, and working memory tasks.

    “and colleagues have successfully designed computer based tasks suitable for preschoolers based on previously validated measures of attention and executive function including appealing and interactive Go/No-Go, response inhibition, delayed alternation, self-ordered pointing and working memory tasks (Hrabok, Kerns, & Muller, 2007;Muller, Kerns, & Konkin, 2012).”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Hrabok, Kerns, & Muller, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hrabok, M., Kerns, K. A., & Müller, U.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Hrabok, Marianne
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2007-09-05
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
408-421
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W2050514037
Cited by
29
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
attentional networks, sustained attention, orienting, executive attention, inhibition, working memory, preschool children, attention development, age differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Arousal, Attention, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review