Cited by 105Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Short-term ECG for out of hospital detection of silent atrial fibrillation episodes

Open access
Doliwa, Peter Sobocinski, Frykman, Viveka, Rosenqvist, Mårten·2009·Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a short-term ECG, thumb ECG, for detection of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes. The aim was to evaluate registration efficacy, sensitivity, specificity, quality and feasibility in patients with special emphasis on asymptomatic AF. DESIGN: One hundred patients registered their cardiac rhythm with 12-lead ECG immediately followed by thumb ECG. The registrations were compared blindly. A second group of 12 patients, who had successfully undergone cardioversion, performed rhythm registration twice daily for 30 days. A third group of 606 individuals underwent an AF screening procedure. RESULTS: Thumb ECG correctly diagnosed AF (sensitivity) in 96% and sinus rhythm (specificity) in 92% compared with 12-lead ECG. In the group of cardioverted patients, 466 registrations were validated: 95% had satisfactory quality for diagnosis: four patients experienced AF recurrence in which three were asymptomatic. In the third group 12 persons were diagnosed with AF, six of these had neither symptoms nor a history of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term ECG is able to diagnose AF with a high sensitivity, specificity and simple application making detection of asymptomatic AF possible for screening purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14017430802593435

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doliwa, P. S., Frykman, V., & Rosenqvist, M.
Affiliations
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Doliwa, Peter Sobocinski
Venue
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Published
2009-01
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
163-168
ISSN
  • 1401-7431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2006
OpenAlex
W2085420007
Cited by
105
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
silent atrial fibrillation, asymptomatic atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation screening, 12-lead ECG comparison, cardioversion, atrial fibrillation recurrence, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Electrocardiography, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Telemetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review