Cited by 34Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in the community

Quinn, F. Russell, Gladstone, David·2014·Current Opinion in Cardiology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent years have seen significant advances in knowledge about the prevalence of 'silent' atrial fibrillation and the morbidity associated with this condition. Data are emerging on improved strategies for screening, and new technologies for detecting atrial fibrillation are becoming available, making a review of this field timely. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies suggest that, when screening is performed, undiagnosed atrial fibrillation is present in around 1% of the screened population, rising to 1.4% for those aged at least 65 years. The prevalence of silent atrial fibrillation is even higher in patients with additional risk factors (e.g. those aged 75 years, patients with heart failure). Prolonged monitoring of patients with hypertension and an implanted cardiac device showed subclinical atrial arrhythmias in at least 10% and these patients had a 2.5-fold increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism. The feasibility of screening for silent atrial fibrillation has been demonstrated in a number of populations and many new technologies for atrial fibrillation detection exist, which could improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this process. SUMMARY: Increased attention is being directed towards screening for silent atrial fibrillation and our 'toolbox' for detecting it is expanding. Whether this will translate into improved outcomes for patients remains to be proven.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hco.0000000000000018

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The detection rate of asymptomatic AF by new technologies such as smartphone cases with ECG electrodes, smart watches, and blood pressure machines with AF detection algorithms has not yet been formally evaluated against an established arrhythmia detection method.

    “The detection rate of asymptomatic AF by new technologies such as smartphone cases with ECG electrodes, smart watches, and blood pressure machines with AF detection algorithms, has not yet been formally evaluated against an established arrhythmia detection method.140”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, F. R., & Gladstone, D.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Quinn, F. Russell
Venue
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Published
2014-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
28-35
ISSN
0268-4705 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012180585
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
silent atrial fibrillation, undiagnosed atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation screening, community-based screening, prevalence, stroke risk, systemic embolism, cardiac implantable electronic devices, hypertension, heart failure, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Humans, Mass Screening, Risk Factors, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review