Cited by 47Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Sleep architecture and sleep-related mentation in securely and insecurely attached people

Open access
McNamara, Patrick, Pace-Schott, Edward F., Johnson, Patricia, Harris, Erica, Auerbach, Sanford·2011·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Based on REM sleep's brain activation patterns and its participation in consolidation of emotional memories, we tested the hypothesis that measures of REM sleep architecture and REM sleep-related mentation would be associated with attachment orientation. After a habituation night in a sleep lab, a convenience sample of 64 healthy volunteers were awakened 10 minutes into a REM sleep episode and 10 minutes into a control NREM sleep episode in counterbalanced order, then asked to report a dream and to rate themselves and a significant other on a list of trait adjectives. Relative to participants classified as having secure attachment orientations, participants classified as anxious took less time to enter REM sleep and had a higher frequency of REM dreams with aggression and self-denigrating themes. There were no significant differences across attachment groups in other measures of sleep architecture or in post REM-sleep awakening ratings on PANAS subscales reflecting mood and alertness. Selected aspects of REM sleep architecture and mentation appeared to be associated with attachment orientation. We suggest that REM sleep plays a role in processing experiences and emotions related to attachment, and that certain features of sleep and dreaming reflect attachment orientations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2011.553999

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants with anxious attachment styles had shorter REM sleep latencies and more frequent REM dreams containing aggression and self-denigrating themes than participants with secure attachment.

    “In a second study (180), participants with anxious attachment styles had shorter REM sleep latencies and more frequent REM dreams containing aggression and self-denigrating themes than did participants with secure attachment.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [180]

    The Sleep Architecture results report significantly shorter REM latency for anxious participants than for secure participants. The Discussion and Sleep-Related Mentation results compare aggression and self-negativity in REM dreams primarily with the avoidant group, not the secure group; the self-negativity difference is reported as a trend. Thus the claimed secure-group comparison for dream themes is not supported by those findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nishida M Pearsall J Buckner RL Walker MP 2009 REM sleep, prefrontal theta, and the consolidation of human emotional memory Cerebral Cortex 19 1158 1166 18832332 PMC2665156
  2. Wechsler D 2001 Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) San Antonio Pearson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamara, P., Pace-Schott, E. F., Johnson, P., Harris, E., & Auerbach, S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Patrick
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2011-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
141-154
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2038061350
Cited by
47
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Boston University
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH076916)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025771)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
REM sleep, sleep architecture, attachment orientation, insecure attachment, dream content, emotional memory consolidation, REM latency, anxiety, alertness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Cognition, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Psychological Theory, Psychometrics, Reading, Risk Factors, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review