Cited by 225Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The effects of 53 hours of sleep deprivation on moral judgment

Killgore, William D.S., Killgore, Desiree B., Day, Lisa M., Li, Christopher, Kamimori, Gary H., Balkin, Thomas J.·2007·SLEEP

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Functional neuroimaging studies suggest a prominent role for the medial prefrontal cortex in the formation of moral judgments. Activity in this region has also been shown to decline significantly during sleep loss. We therefore examined the effects of 2 nights of sleep deprivation on several aspects of moral judgment. DESIGN: Participants made judgments about the "appropriateness" of various courses of action in response to 3 types of moral dilemmas at rested baseline and again following 53 hours of continuous wakefulness. SETTING: In-residence sleep laboratory at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six healthy adults (21 men, 5 women). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compared to baseline, sleep deprivation resulted in significantly longer response latencies (suggesting greater difficulty deciding upon a course of action) only for Moral Personal (i.e., emotionally evocative) dilemmas, whereas response times to Moral Impersonal (less emotionally evocative) and Non Moral dilemmas did not change significantly with sleep loss. The effect of sleep deprivation on the willingness to agree with solutions that violate personally held moral beliefs was moderated by the level of emotional intelligence, as measured by the Bar-On EQ-i. Persons high in emotional intelligence were less susceptible to changes in moral judgments as a function of sleep loss. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that sleep deprivation impairs the ability to integrate emotion and cognition to guide moral judgments, although susceptibility to the effects of sleep loss on this ability is moderated by the level of emotional intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/30.3.345

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of appropriate engagement of limbic-related PFC regions may contribute to altered positive emotional sensitivity and regulatory control under conditions of sleep loss, with cognition being driven more by subcortical affective circuits.

    “A lack of appropriate engagement of these limbic-related PFC regions may therefore contribute to altered positive emotional sensitivity and regulatory control under conditions of sleep loss, with cognition being driven more by subcortical affective circuits (Killgore et al., 2006; Killgore et al., 2007; Venkatraman et al., 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Killgore, W. D. S., Killgore, D. B., Day, L. M., Li, C., Kamimori, G. H., & Balkin, T. J.
Affiliations
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Corresponding author
Killgore, William D.S.
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2007-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
345-352
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2410974606
Cited by
225
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
sleep deprivation, moral judgment, ethical dilemmas, medial prefrontal cortex, emotional intelligence, response latency, emotion-cognition integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Caffeine, Chewing Gum, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Military Personnel, Morals, Personality Inventory, Reaction Time, Sleep Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review