Cited by 133Attachment and Relationship DynamicsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New beginnings for mothers and babies in prison: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Sleed, Michelle, Baradon, Tessa, Fonagy, Peter·2013·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Mothers in prison represent a high-risk parenting population. New Beginnings is an attachment-based group intervention designed specifically for mothers and babies in prison. This cluster randomized trial examined the outcomes for 88 mothers and babies participating in the New Beginnings program and 75 dyads residing in prisons where the intervention did not take place. Outcomes were measured in terms of parental reflective functioning, the quality of parent-infant interaction, maternal depression, and maternal representations. Mothers in the control group deteriorated in their level of reflective functioning and behavioral interaction with their babies over time, whereas the mothers in the intervention group did not. There were no significant group effects on levels of maternal depression or mothers' self-reported representations of their babies over time. An attachment-based intervention may mitigate some of the risks to the quality of the parent-infant relationship for these dyads.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2013.782651

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Consort diagram showing the flow of participants through the trial.
Figure 1. Consort diagram showing the flow of participants through the trial.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Baradon T., 2006, New beginnings for mothers and babies in prison
  2. Danis I., 2005, Alkalmazott Pszichológia [Applied Psychology), 7, 27
  3. Feldman R., 1998, Coding Interactive Behaviour manual. Unpublished manuscript. Israel, Bar-llan University
  4. George C., 2008, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical application
  5. HM Prison Service, 2008, Prison Service Order 4801: The management of mother and baby units
  6. Lyons-Ruth K., 1992, Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology, 4, pp. 131
  7. Lyons-Ruth K., 2003, Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 105
  8. Milford R., 2009, Community Practitioner, 82, 30
  9. Ministry of Justice, 2010, Offender management caseload statistics 2009
  10. Murray J., 2008, Crime and justice: A review of research, 37, pp. 133
  11. Oates J., Mothers’ models of their infants
  12. Prison Reform Trust, 2012, Bromley Briefings Prison Factfile, June 2012
  13. Slade A., 2004, The parent development interview – Revised. Unpublished protocol. The City University of New York
  14. Sleed M., 2011, Mothers and babies in prison: Evaluation of the New Beginnings programme
  15. Walmsley R., 2012, World female imprisonment list

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Metadata

Authors
Sleed, M., Baradon, T., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
Anna Freud Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Sleed, Michelle
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2013-04-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
349-367
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W1975890655
Cited by
132
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10228)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
incarcerated mothers, parent-infant relationship, attachment-based intervention, parental reflective functioning, parent-infant interaction, maternal depression, maternal representations, group intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Prisoners, Cluster Analysis, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review