Cited by 14Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Failure to resolve loss and compromised mentalizing in female inpatients with major depressive disorder

Fischer-Kern, Melitta, Tmej, Anna, Naderer, Andrea, Zimmermann, Johannes, Nolte, Tobias·2022·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Attachment and mentalizing are central concepts in research on the etiology, course, and treatment of depression. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to clarify the unique value of these constructs in characterizing the presence, severity, and chronicity of depression. We examined 50 female inpatients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in comparison to 47 matched healthy controls regarding their attachment states of mind, mentalizing capacities, and clinical variables indicating depression severity and chronicity (e.g. illness duration, number of hospitalizations). In the group of depressed patients, unresolved attachment with regard to loss was significantly overrepresented. Dimensionally, patients were more disorganized and more insecure, whereas there was no difference on the dismissing-preoccupied dimension between the two groups. Mentalizing was significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed attachment insecurity, mentalizing deficits, and unresolved loss to be incrementally relevant to predict MDD. Correlations with clinical parameters in the group of depressed patients showed positive associations between mentalizing deficits, attachment insecurity, and variables indicating illness chronicity. Our findings highlight the relevance of the inability to resolve or reappraise loss experiences in depressive states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2021.2015794

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer-Kern, M., Tmej, A., Naderer, A., Zimmermann, J., & Nolte, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2021-12-24
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
503-524
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W4200295973
Cited by
14
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jubiläumsfonds of the Austrian National Bank
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
major depressive disorder, unresolved loss, mentalization, insecure attachment, disorganized attachment, depression severity, female inpatients
MeSH terms
Mentalization, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review