The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access
Abstract
Three experiments investigated the nature of the information required for the lexical access of visual words. A four-field masking procedure was used, in which the presentation of consecutive prime and target letter strings was preceded and followed by presentations of a pattern mask. This procedure prevented subjects from identifying, and thus intentionally using, prime information. Experiment I extablished the existence of a semantic priming effect on target identification, demonstrating the lexical access of primes under these conditions. It also showed a word repetition effect independent of letter case. Experiment II tested whether this repetition effect was due to the activation of graphemic or phonemic information. The graphemic and phonemic similarity of primes and targets was varied. No evidence for phonemic priming was found, although a graphemic priming effect, independent of the physical similarity of the stimuli, was obtained. Finally Experiment III demonstrated that, irrespective of whether the prime was a word or a nonword, graphemic priming was equally effective. In both Experiments II and III, however, the word repetition effect was stronger than the graphemic priming effect. It is argued that facilitation from graphemic priming was due to the prime activating a target representation coded for abstract (non-visual) graphemic features, such as letter identities. The extra facilitation from same identity priming was attributed to semantic as well as graphemic activation. The implications of these results for models of word recognition are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures
Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., & Sanders, E. (1978) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197436 · Cited by 141
Familiarity Effects in Visual Information Processing
Krueger, L. E. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.949 · Cited by 113
Cited by
The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562165 · Cited by 859
Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking
Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2093 · Cited by 835
Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction
Grainger, J. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960701578013 · Cited by 263
Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696 · Cited by 226
Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749408401116 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-350
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W1967723450
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640748108400797
- The paper
- Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.